Solving Central Force Motion: Sketch Equivalent Elliptic & Hyperbolic Orbits

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on sketching elliptical and hyperbolic orbits for two equal-mass objects and their equivalent one-body orbits. The elliptical orbit is described as overlapping ellipses centered at the center of mass, while the hyperbolic orbit is noted to have a higher eccentricity than the elliptical. There is confusion regarding how to visualize the equivalent one-body orbit using the concept of reduced mass. Clarifications emphasize that the system can be simplified to a single object in a central potential, treating one body as fixed. Understanding the derivation of the reduced mass and its relationship to the two-body problem is crucial for visualizing the paths accurately.
w3390
Messages
341
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Sketch the elliptical and hyperbolic orbits two objects make around each other if their masses are equal. Next to each, sketch the equivalent one-body orbit.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



For the elliptical orbit, I just drew two ellipses that overlap in a venn diagram sort of fashion where the center of mass is midway between the two objects.

I am confused about the equivalent one-body orbit. The system can be reduced to a single object of reduced mass \mu but I don't understand how to figure out its path.

For the hyperbolic orbit, wouldn't it just look the same as the elliptical orbit except with a higher eccentricity?

I have the same confusion when trying to deal with the path of the reduced mass in this one too.

If anyone can help clarify to me how I can visualize the sketches, I would greatly appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Firstly go back and look at the details of the reduced mass business. The equivalence is to a single body in a central potential. It becomes essentially a two body problem with the central body fixed (i.e. as if it had infinite mass).

Secondly a hyperbolic orbit is not an ellipse it is a hyperbola.

I would start with the single body in the central well cases first. Then look again at what that reduced case means. You should have seen its derivation somewhere with the position and velocity derived in terms of the positions and velocities of the two bodies.

See how that relates the reduced cases (which are simpler) to the two body cases... especially the relationships of the position vectors.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K