Solving Conductor Questions: Surface Charge, Electron Count, Electric Field

  • Thread starter Thread starter lha08
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conductor
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving problems related to the electric potential of a metal sphere with a diameter of 2 cm and a potential of 10^4 V. The surface charge density was calculated using the formula Q = 4πR²σ, resulting in a value of 8.84 x 10^-6 C/m². The total charge was then converted to the number of electrons by dividing by the elementary charge (1.602 x 10^-19 C). Finally, the electric field strength at the surface was determined using E = kQ/r², confirming that using a radius of 0.01 m was appropriate.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and surface charge density
  • Familiarity with Coulomb's law and electric field calculations
  • Knowledge of the relationship between charge and the number of electrons
  • Basic proficiency in using mathematical formulas involving constants like k (Coulomb's constant)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Coulomb's law in electrostatics
  • Learn about the concept of electric field strength and its calculation in different geometries
  • Explore the relationship between charge, potential, and capacitance in conductive materials
  • Investigate advanced topics in electrostatics, such as Gauss's law and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, as well as educators and professionals seeking to reinforce their understanding of electric fields and charge distributions.

lha08
Messages
158
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The potential of a metal sphere of diameter 2 cm is 10^4 V relative to the ground.
a) What is the surface charge density?
b) How many electrons were removed from the sphere?
c) What is the electric field strength at the surface?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


a) so first I converted the diameter into the radius (0.01 m). Then I considered the formula
Q (total charge)= 4 X pi X R^2 X sigma. The sigma is the surface charge density. So then since i have the electric potential and the radius, I replaced Q in the first equation with the electric potential. In this case, VR/k =Q where k=9.0X10^9...and when I solved it, I got 8.84X10^-6 C/m^2...but does this seem right because I have a gut feeling that it isn't...

b) for the next question, i solved for Q (the total charge) and then converted the Joules into electrons by dividing the total charge by 1.602X10^-19 C...again I'm not sure if my method makes sense...

c) for the last one, I used E= kq/r^2..and I basically plugged in the numbers but I'm not sure if placing 0.01 m for the radius is the right move...

Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lha08 said:
a) so first I converted the diameter into the radius (0.01 m). Then I considered the formula
Q (total charge)= 4 X pi X R^2 X sigma. The sigma is the surface charge density. So then since i have the electric potential and the radius, I replaced Q in the first equation with the electric potential. In this case, VR/k =Q where k=9.0X10^9...and when I solved it, I got 8.84X10^-6 C/m^2...but does this seem right because I have a gut feeling that it isn't...

It's right. The static charge that builds up on everyday objects is extremely small, on the order of millionths or billionths of a coloumb. Even a cloud-to-ground lightning strike delivers only 300 coloumbs.

b) for the next question, i solved for Q (the total charge) and then converted the Joules into electrons by dividing the total charge by 1.602X10^-19 C...again I'm not sure if my method makes sense...

Well, you didn't convert the joules to electrons; you converted the coloumbs to electrons. Your method is right.

c) for the last one, I used E= kq/r^2..and I basically plugged in the numbers but I'm not sure if placing 0.01 m for the radius is the right move...

Yup, that's how you do it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K