Solving Differential Equations: Linear Models Homework

  • Thread starter Thread starter Arshad_Physic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear Models
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a physics scenario where an archer shoots an arrow from a height, and the discussion centers around determining the maximum elevation reached by the arrow while accounting for air resistance. The subject area includes differential equations and dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of differential equations to model the motion of the arrow, including the effects of gravity and air resistance. There are attempts to derive the velocity and position functions, with some questioning the signs and constants used in the equations.

Discussion Status

Several participants are actively engaging with the problem, pointing out potential mistakes in the original poster's calculations and suggesting re-evaluations of the equations used. There is a recognition of the complexity of the problem, with no clear consensus on the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note confusion regarding the signs in the equations and the implications of the drag constant. The original poster expresses frustration over repeated incorrect results, indicating a need for further clarification and assistance.

Arshad_Physic
Messages
50
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



An Archer on top of a 50-ft high cliff shoots a 4-oz arrow straight up in the air. The bow is strung so that it can achieve maximum initial velocity of 128 feet per second. If the air resistance causes a drag constant of 1/1024 lb/fps, what is the maximum elevation reached by the arrow?


Homework Equations



mg-kv = m dv/dt


The Attempt at a Solution



So, here is the working I have done. But my answer is coming out to be WRONG. The answer should be 244 ft.

m=4 oz = 0.25 lb
k = 1/1024

mg-kv = m dv/dt

v(0) = 128
x(0) = 50

8 - v/1024 = 0.25 dv/dt

Multiply both sides by 1024 to make things easier:

8192 - v = 256 dv/dt

Separable equation, so after solving, I get:

v = Ae^(t/256) + 8192

Use the given condition: v(0) = 128 :

128 = A + 8192,
A = -8064

v(t) = -8064e(t/256) + 8192

x(t) = integral[v(t)]

Thus, x(t) = -8064*256 e(t/256) + 8192t + c
= -2064384e(t/256) + 8192t + C

Using given condition x(0) = 50
c = 2064434

Thus, x(t) = -2064384e(t/256) + 8192t + 2064434

on the equation: v(t) = -8064e(t/256) + 8192, I use the condition v(? time) = 0

I get: t = 4.0316 seconds

I plug this in my x(t) equation and I get 307 feet.

This is WRONG! The answer should be 244 feet!

PLEASE HELP! :)

Thanks!

Arshad
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Arshad! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)

You keep getting + and - mixed up …
Arshad_Physic said:
mg-kv = m dv/dt
Nooo …

8192 - v = 256 dv/dt

Separable equation, so after solving, I get:

v = Ae^(t/256) + 8192

Nooo … :redface:
 
Ahh no - AFter integrating, the signs change and I get this answer. In one of the examples I have, the same thing happens to it as well.

When we integrate "8192 - v = 256 dv/dt", then we get:

-ln(8192-v) = t/256 + c

thus, it becomes v = Ae(t/256) + 8192

PS: I should had used the x2 button lol - sorry! :)
 
Arshad_Physic said:
-ln(8192-v) = t/256 + c

thus, it becomes v = Ae(t/256) + 8192

No, e-t/256

and what about your mg-kv = m dv/dt ?
 


ohh! Now I see my mistake! But still the asnwer is not coming right! :O

okay, so:

v = Ae-t/256 + 8192


128 = A + 8192,
A = -8064

v(t) = -8064e(-t/256) + 8192

x(t) = integral[v(t)]

Thus, x(t) = -8064*-256 e(t/256) + 8192t + c
= 2064384e(-t/256) + 8192t + C

Using given condition x(0) = 50
c = -2064434

Thus, x(t) = 2064384e(-t/256) + 8192t - 2064434

on the equation: v(t) = -8064e(-t/256) + 8192, I use the condition v(? time) = 0

I get: t = -4.0316 seconds => (This is impossible, right?)

I plug this in my x(t) equation and I get -208.7 feet as my answer.

This is STILL WONG...The answer should be 244 ft...

This problem is giving me such a headache! Lol ! :)
 
Are you still using mg-kv instead of -mg-kv ?
 
Oh, I didn't understood that you were pointing that mistake of mine too! lol

But still, after using -mg-kv, I am getting t = 3.969 and my vertical distance is coming out to be 303.36 m...it should be 244 meters...

by the way, thanks a million for all the help you're giving! :)
 
hmm :confused:

perhaps the best thing is for you to sleep on it :zzz:, and write it all out again tomorrow …

maybe it'll be different then! :smile:
 
lol

I will try putting the question to some other helping forums I guess! :) Or else post it here again - maybe someone else can figure it out! :)

Thanks a ton! :)
 
  • #10
...can someone else figure out the problem and help me?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K