Solving Difficult Differential Equations

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
Messages
2,802
Reaction score
605
Could somebody help me to solve this really tough differential equations?

[tex]\left( {x}{y} \sqrt{{x}^{2} - {y}^{2}}+{x} \right){y'}={y}-{x}^{2} \sqrt{{x}^{2}-{y}^{2}}[/tex]

Another tough one.I tried MATLAB which gave me sth about lambertW function which I haven't heard about before.Is there an easier answer?

[tex]\left( {x}^{2}-{y} \right){y'}+{x}=0[/tex]

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
really it's tough enough to confuse my mind!
somebody answer these 2 questions please
Thanks
 
I didn't think these two are this hard that I don't get the answer after writing this thread.
These are just two exersises of a textbook on O.D.E.s
You don't have even a little tip?
 
Ok... first of all, one should not post textbook exercises in this section. Anyway, i will show how the lambertW funtion appears from the second DE:

[tex](x^2-y)y'+x=0[/tex]

Using the substituition:

[tex]u=x^2-y[/tex]

we get:

[tex]y=x^2-u[/tex] and [tex]y'=2x-u'[/tex].

So, the DE becomes:

[tex]u(2x-u')+x=0[/tex]

Isolating u', we get:

[tex]u'=\frac{(2u+1)x}{u}[/tex]

Writing u' as du/dx and separating the variables:

[tex]\left[ \frac{u}{2u+1} \right] du = x dx[/tex]

Integrating both sides gives:

[tex]\int \frac{u du}{2u+1} = \frac{x^2}{2}+c[/tex]

The substituition v=2u+1 is useful, and gives:

[tex]\int \frac{1}{4} \left[ 1-\frac{1}{v} \right] dv = \frac{x^2}{2}+c[/tex]

Which, integrated, leads to:

[tex]v - ln(v)=2x^2+4c[/tex]

Ok... now we have to isolate v in this equation. And this is where the lambertW function appears. The http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambert_W_function" function W(x) is defined as the function that satisfies this equation:

[tex]x=W(x)e^{W(x)}[/tex]

Taking logarithms, we get:

[tex]ln(x) = ln[W(x)] + W(x)[/tex]

And this resembles very much the function v (which is actually v(x)) we got when solving the DE. I can't say that v(x)=W(x) because we have the - sign instead the + sign. Anyway, I am pretty sure the function v(x) is related to the lambertW function, as you mentioned that MATLAB gave it as a possible solution.

I didnt try to solve the first equation. But probably there is some substituition like the one i did that can make it a bit easier to solve.
 
Last edited by a moderator: