MHB Solving Exponential Equations: Need Help Understanding 2 Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter linapril
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponential
AI Thread Summary
To solve the exponential equation (2^x + 2)^2, the correct expansion is 2^(2x) + 2^(x+2) + 4, which differs from the initial incorrect answer of 22x + 2x + 4. The middle term was identified as the source of confusion. For the second question, the simplification of 84x/32x to (84/32)x is correct, and it can be further simplified to 27x by reducing the fraction. Understanding these steps clarifies the solutions to both questions.
linapril
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I need help with understanding two questions:
1. (2x+2)2
The answer I got was: 22x+2x++4, but according to the answers that is wrong. Can any explain why?

2. 84x/32x
I simplified this to become (84/32)x, but I don't know how to go from there... The answer is apparently 27x, but I don't understand how that can be...

Would appreciate the help enormously,
//APRIL
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Nevermind, I understood question 2 now, but question 1 is still a mystery to me...
 
linapril said:
I need help with understanding two questions:
1. (2x+2)2
The answer I got was: 22x+2x++4, but according to the answers that is wrong. Can any explain why?

I think the middle term is wrong. The first and the last terms look good though. Check your work and if you still don't see it then post your attempt and we'll help you sort it out :)
 
linapril said:
I need help with understanding two questions:
1. (2x+2)2
The answer I got was: 22x+2x++4, but according to the answers that is wrong. Can any explain why?

2. 84x/32x
I simplified this to become (84/32)x, but I don't know how to go from there... The answer is apparently 27x, but I don't understand how that can be...

Would appreciate the help enormously,
//APRIL

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left( 2^x + 2 \right)^2 &= \left( 2^x \right)^2 + 2\cdot 2\cdot 2^x + 2^2 \\ &= 2^{2x} + 2^{x + 2} + 2^2 \end{align*}$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top