MHB Solving for $E(x)$ when X is a Fair Die Toss

  • Thread starter Thread starter dfraser
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the expected value E(X) for the number of times a fair die is tossed before a six appears. The expected value is derived using the formula E(X) = ∑ x·p(x), where p(x) is the probability distribution of the outcomes. The key step involves recognizing that the sum can be simplified using the formula for the infinite series, leading to E(X) = 5. An alternative method discussed involves conditioning on the outcome of the first throw, ultimately confirming that E = 5. The explanation clarifies the confusion regarding the squared term in the denominator of the expected value calculation.
dfraser
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'm given that: X is the random variable for the number of times a fair die is tossed before a six appears, and asked for E(x).

I know the solution is 5 but am struggling to understand how I'm meant to get there. I understand:

$$E(x) = \sum_{x=0}^{\infty} x\cdot p(x)\ $$
$$= \sum_{x=0}^{\infty} x \cdot (1/6) \cdot (5/6)^x $$
$$= 5/6 \cdot 1/6 \cdot\sum_{x=1}^{\infty} x \cdot (5/6)^{x-1} $$

but am then given that:

$$= \frac{5/6 \cdot 1/6}{{(1-5/6)}^{2}} =5 $$

I recognize the numerator, and know the formula for the infinite sum of a geometric series is $$\frac{a}{1-r}$$ but I don't know how to get the denominator from the prior step or why it is squared. I think this is an easy mistake, but I can't seem to find it. Can anyone help me here?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
\[
\sum_{n=1}^\infty nx^{n-1}= \sum_{n=1}^\infty \left(x^n\right)' =\sum_{n=0}^\infty \left(x^n\right)' \overset{(*)}{=}\left(\sum_{n=0}^\infty x^n\right)' =\left(\frac{1}{1-x}\right)' =\frac{1}{(1-x)^2}.
\]
The equality (*) holds for $x$ in the interval of convergence of the right-hand side, i.e., for $|x|<1$.
 
dfraser said:
I'm given that: X is the random variable for the number of times a fair die is tossed before a six appears, and asked for E(x).

I know the solution is 5 but am struggling to understand how I'm meant to get there. I understand:

$$E(x) = \sum_{x=0}^{\infty} x\cdot p(x)\ $$
$$= \sum_{x=0}^{\infty} x \cdot (1/6) \cdot (5/6)^x $$
$$= 5/6 \cdot 1/6 \cdot\sum_{x=1}^{\infty} x \cdot (5/6)^{x-1} $$

but am then given that:

$$= \frac{5/6 \cdot 1/6}{{(1-5/6)}^{2}} =5 $$

I recognize the numerator, and know the formula for the infinite sum of a geometric series is $$\frac{a}{1-r}$$ but I don't know how to get the denominator from the prior step or why it is squared. I think this is an easy mistake, but I can't seem to find it. Can anyone help me here?

Hi dfraser! Welcome to MHB! :)Let's define:
$$f(y) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty ny^{n-1}$$
Then:
$$\int f(y) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty y^n + C_1 = \sum_{n=0}^\infty y^n + C_2 = \frac 1{1-y} + C_2$$
Taking the derivative, we get:
$$f(y) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty ny^{n-1} = \frac 1{(1-y)^2} \tag{1}$$When we apply $(1)$ to your formula, then:
$$E(x)
= \frac 56 \cdot \frac 16 \cdot\sum_{x=1}^{\infty} x \cdot \left(\frac{5}{6}\right)^{\!{x-1}}
= \frac 56 \cdot \frac 16 \cdot \frac 1 {(1 - \frac 56)^2}$$Edit: for some reason I completely missed Evgeny's response. Ah well.
 
The infinite series approach is fine, but here is another way for the sake of variety: condition on the result of the first throw. Let's say E is the expected number of throws before throwing a 6.

With probability 1/6, you will throw a 6 on the first throw. In this case the number of throws before a 6 is 0.

With probability 5/6, you throw something else (not a 6). You are now in the same state you were in before the first throw, but since you have taken one throw, the total number of throws expected before you get a 6 is E+1.

So $E = (1/6) \; 0 + (5/6) \;(E+1)$. Solve for E.
 
Thanks everyone, I understand now.
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K