Solving for Electric Field of Uniform Line Charge | Coulomb's Law Example

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the electric field generated by a uniform line charge with a specified linear charge density. The line charge extends over a defined length, and the task includes finding the total charge and the electric field at a specific point on the y-axis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to find the total charge and expresses uncertainty about how to approach calculating the electric field, particularly regarding the use of Coulomb's Law.
  • Some participants suggest using calculus and integrating to find the electric field from infinitesimal charge elements along the line.
  • Questions arise about expressing the angle and distance in terms of the coordinates involved in the problem.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the integration approach needed to solve for the electric field. Some guidance has been provided regarding the setup of the integral and the components of the electric field, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct method or final expression yet.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the correct expression for the angle and the integration limits, as well as the need for trigonometric substitution in the integral. The original poster's attempts suggest a lack of clarity in applying the concepts of Coulomb's Law and calculus to this specific problem.

clickcaptain
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A uniform line charge extends from x = - 2.7 cm to x = + 2.7 cm and has a linear charge density of lambda = 6.5 nC/m.

(a) Find the total charge.

Find the electric field on the y-axis at the following distances.
(b) y = 4 cm



2. The attempt at a solution

It was easy to find the charge...

Q = 6.5 nC/m * 0.054 m = 3.51nC*10e-1

..I'm having issues with how to approach the second part, I don't know whether to use an equation, I'm not even sure which equation to use, I know I need to use Coulomb's Law but I don't know how to use it. Thanks for the help in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use

E = \int\mbox{dE}

where

dE = K\frac{\lambda\mbox{dx}}{r^2}cos\theta

If you draw the configuration the distance r is from a charge element to a point on the y-axis thus forming a right triangle. The horizontal components of E will cancel (equal and opposite) so only the vertical component of E from each charge element will contribute. Express cosine theta in terms of x.
 
You have to use calculus and coloumb's law to solve for the field of a finite line charge.

HINT: Find the field from an infinitesimal point on the line using Coloumbs law, then integrate over the length of the line.
 
Okay, so I tried integrating, I don't think I did it right though. I don't know exactly how to express cos(theta) in terms of x but this is what I tried, please correct me if I'm wrong...

r = 0.0483
theta = 55.981

E = integration(8.99*10^9 * (6.5*10^-9)/(0.0483)^2 *cos(55.981)) with respect to x from -0.027 to 0.027
 
I erred with the component of E. Since the horizontal components cancel, the vertical component is dEsin(theta). So, the integral is

\int\mbox{dE} = \int\mbox{K}\frac{\lambda\mbox{dx}}{r^2}sin\theta

Now,

r^2=x^2+y^2

and

\mbox{sin}\theta=\frac{y}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}}

where y is constant (the fixed height to evaluate E). Now, you have a single variable integral in x so set the limits for x and this will give you the desired result. Or you could set the limits from one end of the line to zero then double the result because of symmetry. Use trigonometric substitution to solve the integral.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K