Solving for electron activity given pH and ratio of redox elements

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving for electron activity in a redox reaction given a pH of 8.2 and a logK value of 4.25. The half-reaction presented is 8e- + 9H+ + SO42- = HS- + 4H2O, leading to an equilibrium expression involving the concentration of species and electron activity. The user encounters difficulty due to having two unknowns, X and e-, in the equation derived from the equilibrium statement. Clarification is sought on whether X represents an unknown variable or a multiplication sign.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of redox reactions and half-reactions
  • Familiarity with equilibrium constants and their calculations
  • Knowledge of pH and its relation to hydrogen ion concentration
  • Basic grasp of logarithmic functions in chemical equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of equilibrium expressions for redox reactions
  • Learn how to manipulate logarithmic equations in chemical contexts
  • Explore the Nernst equation for calculating electron activity
  • Investigate the role of pH in redox equilibria and its impact on reaction dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, researchers in electrochemistry, and professionals working with redox reactions and equilibrium calculations will benefit from this discussion.

peeballs
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
What is the apparent pO2 (atm) in equilibrium with a pE governed by the sulfate/sulfide redox buffer when
(SO4
2-) = 10x (HS-) at paH 8.2? Use constants from Table 8.6a, pg. 465, assume I=0.
Relevant Equations
K = Products/Reactants
I've written out the half reaction

8e- + 9H+ + SO42- = HS- + 4H2O

and I know the logK = 4.25 (that's the constant mentioned in the prompt)

I've written out the equilibrium statement of 10^4.25 = ([x^1/8]*[H2O^1/2])/([10x^1/8]*[e-]*[(10^-8.2)^9/8]

However, from there, it seems like I have two unknowns - the X, and the e-, which I'm solving for. I don't know of any formulas that would be useful here and I was specifically told to use this expression to solve it.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You sure x is an unknown, and not a multiplication sign?
 
Borek said:
You sure x is an unknown, and not a multiplication sign?
Yes, but you managed to find me on a different forum and explain why I was having a brainfart so it all works out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
6K