Solving for invariant points on trig transformations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding invariant points between a base trigonometric function and its transformation through horizontal stretching. The original poster expresses uncertainty about how to approach the problem without relying on trigonometric identities or simplifications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definition of invariant points and discuss the implications of horizontal versus vertical stretches on these points. Questions arise about the nature of points that remain unchanged and whether points of intersection qualify as invariant.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the definitions and implications of invariant points in the context of transformations. Some guidance has been offered regarding specific cases, such as the behavior of the sine function under vertical stretches, while the understanding of horizontal stretches remains a point of clarification.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted ambiguity in the original poster's question, particularly regarding the distinction between invariant points and points of intersection. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of these concepts.

zeion
Messages
455
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Hello.
I came across a question that required me to solve for invariant points between a base trig function and the function after horizontal stretch. I can't remember the exact question right now, but I'm just wondering how I would go about solving it if I didn't know any trig identities or if the transformation couldn't be easily simplified with identities.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your question is a bit on the vague side, so I'll do the best I can with the available information. Suppose the function is y = sin(x), and the new function is y = sin(x/3), which represents a stretch away from the vertical axis by a factor of 3.

For the transformed function the only point that stays the same is the one whose distance is 0 from the vertical axis; namely, (0, 0).
 
What about points where the two graphs intersect?
 
How are you defining "invariant points"? I am interpreting this to mean points that do not change. If you are really asking about the points of intersection of the two graphs, that's what you should be asking about, I think.
 
But wouldn't the points where the 2 graphs intersect also be points that "don't change"?
 
I don't think so, not with a horizontal stretch. On the other hand, if you consider vertical stretches, the invariant points, as I would define them, would be all the points that don't get moved. For example, if y = sin(x), the graph of y = 2sin(x) is stretched away from the horizontal axis by a factor of 2. All of the zeroes of sin(x) (e.g., x = 0, π, 2π, -π, -2π, etc.) are also zeroes of 2sin(x), so the zeroes of y = sin(x) are invariant points under this transformation.
 
Yes the vertical case is clear to me.

Since the y point for the zeroes are zero, anything applied them would not change them.

I was just confused about the horizontal stretch/compression.
So does this mean the only invariant point for a horizontal stretch/compression is when x = 0?
 
Yes. Every other point on the graph of the untransformed graph moves either closer to or farther away from the vertical axis.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K