Solving for Net Force of Charge Q on Two Charges q1 & q2

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on determining the position of a charge Q such that the net force on it due to two other charges, q1 and q2, is zero. The participants utilize the equation F = kq1Q / r + kq2Q / r and derive the equation 0 = L^2 + 2xL + 5x^2 to find the distance x from charge q2. The values used are q1 = 8 and q2 = -2. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly managing signs in equations to arrive at the correct solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law and electric forces
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation of equations
  • Knowledge of quadratic equations and their solutions
  • Basic principles of electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Coulomb's Law and its applications
  • Learn how to solve quadratic equations using the quadratic formula
  • Explore the concept of electric field and potential due to point charges
  • Investigate the effects of charge polarity on force calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, as well as educators teaching concepts related to electric forces and charge interactions.

kashmirekat
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
Hello all,

I have two charges, q1 & q2, along a horizontal axis of length L. I supposed to determine the length at which another charge, Q, can be placed so that its net force is zero, other than infinitely away.

I'm using the equation:
F = kq1Q / r + kq2Q / r
-- > kq1Q / (L+x)^2 = -( kq2Q / x^2 ) where x is the distance the point is away from L.

I substitute my #s and I get the equation:
(8 / (l^2 + 2xL + x^2)) = -(2/x^2)
and then I get:
8x^2 = -2(L^2 + 2xL + x^2)
-4x^2 = L^2 + 2xL + x^2
0 = L^2 + 2xL + 5x^2
Is this right? I cannot seem to solve for x.

I thought I initially had it, but reworked through my math and realized I forgot to have 2q negative. What I initally got was:
L^2 + 2xL - 3x^2
I can solve that by 'unfoiling' easily, but, as I previously mentioned, the math isn't correct to get that equation.

Thank you for your help and have a wonderful day.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What values are you using for q1 and q2?
 
I'm using 8 for q1 and -2 for q2.
 
Originally posted by kashmirekat

I thought I initially had it, but reworked through my math and realized I forgot to have 2q negative. What I initally got was:
L^2 + 2xL - 3x^2
I can solve that by 'unfoiling' easily, but, as I previously mentioned, the math isn't correct to get that equation.
What makes you think the math isn't correct? Looks right to me.
 
I start with this equation:
(8 / (L^2 + 2xL + x^2)) = -(-2/x^2), cross multiply
8x^2 = -2(L^2 + 2xL + x^2), divide by -2
-4x^2 = L^2 + 2xL + x^2, add -4x^2
0 = L^2 + 2xL + 5x^2, not L^2 + 2xL - 3x^2 as I had originally hoped for.
So, how do you solve for x (in terms of L) for this equation:
0 = L^2 + 2xL + 5x^2
 
Originally posted by kashmirekat
I start with this equation:
(8 / (L^2 + 2xL + x^2)) = -(-2/x^2), cross multiply
8x^2 = -2(L^2 + 2xL + x^2), divide by -2
-4x^2 = L^2 + 2xL + x^2, add -4x^2
0 = L^2 + 2xL + 5x^2, not L^2 + 2xL - 3x^2 as I had originally hoped for.
You are messing up with signs. In your first equation, the minus signs cancel. Your original hope was correct. :smile:
 
I was in the middle of asking a question about the signs and your response answered it perfectly.

Thank you.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
994
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
17K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
831
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K