Solving for r: 3.24 Meters Too Far?

  • Thread starter Wzss
  • Start date
In summary, the formula used to find the radius was not set up correctly, resulting in a unit error. After correcting the formula, the correct answer for the radius should be obtained.
  • #1
Wzss
5
1
Homework Statement
A bug crawls outward from the center of a CD spinning at 200 revolutions per minute. coefficient of static friction between bug's sticky feet and disc surface is 1.2. How far does the bug get from the center before slipping?
Relevant Equations
centripetal acceleration = (v^2 / r) = (4pi^2r)/ t^2
F_net= ma (newton's second law)
static friction = "mu" F_n (normal force)
200rpm/60 = 3.33 revolutions per second
I set (μ_s) *mg equal to (m*4pi^2r)/T^2
Then I solved for r
However, when I solve for r, I get 3.24 meters which seems much too far for a bug to travel. Should I have divided by something somewhere instead of multiplied?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Wzss said:
I set (μ_s) *mg equal to (m*4pi^2r)/T^2
Then I solved for r
However, when I solve for r, I get 3.24 meters which seems much too far for a bug to travel. Should I have divided by something somewhere instead of multiplied?
Yes, that's too big.
Please post the details of the calculation.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR and Wzss
  • #3
haruspex said:
Yes, that's too big.
Please post the details of the calculation.
Thank you for the response!
Here is what I've been getting
r = (μ_s (mg)) * (t^2/ 4pi^2) (got this equation from setting equal static friction and centripetal force, then eliminating mass and solving equation for r)
r = (1.2*9.8*(3.3)^2) / 4pi^2
r = 3.24 meters
I know this makes no sense, but I'm not sure how else to arrange the equation
 
  • #4
Wzss said:
Thank you for the response!
Here is what I've been getting
r = (μ_s (mg)) * (t^2/ 4pi^2) (got this equation from setting equal static friction and centripetal force, then eliminating mass and solving equation for r)
r = (1.2*9.8*(3.3)^2) / 4pi^2
r = 3.24 meters
I know this makes no sense, but I'm not sure how else to arrange the equation
You should always verify the units of your proposed solution:$$r=(1.2) (9.8 m/s^2)(3.3/s)^2/(4\pi^2)=3.24 m/s^4$$which aren't the right units for a radius. Check your algebra!
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR and Wzss
  • #5
renormalize said:
You should always verify the units of your proposed solution:$$r=(1.2) (9.8 m/s)(3.3/s)^2/(4\pi^2)=3.24 ms$$which aren't the right units for a radius. Check your algebra!
I'm confused. How did you get 3.24 ms?
When I do it, the m/s^2 from the 9.8 and the s^2 after squaring T cancel out, leaving meters. Since 9.8 is acceleration, shouldn't it be m/s^2?
 
  • #6
Wzss said:
I'm confused. How did you get 3.24 ms?
When I do it, the m/s^2 from the 9.8 and the s^2 after squaring T cancel out, leaving meters
I updated my post.
 
  • Like
Likes Wzss
  • #7
renormalize said:
I updated my post.
Oh I see, thank you
but then, is my answer completely wrong? how do I get an answer that makes sense for radius?
 
  • #8
Wzss said:
Oh I see, thank you
but then, is my answer completely wrong? how do I get an answer that makes sense for radius?
As I said, check the algebra you used to find the radius. In your formula, should the square of the frequency ##3.3/s## be in the numerator or the denominator?
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR and Wzss
  • #9
renormalize said:
As I said, check the algebra you used to find the radius. In your formula, should the square of the frequency ##3.3/s## be in the numerator or the denominator?
ah I see now, thank you so much!
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman

FAQ: Solving for r: 3.24 Meters Too Far?

What is the context of "Solving for r: 3.24 Meters Too Far?"

"Solving for r: 3.24 Meters Too Far?" appears to be a problem or scenario involving a calculation or measurement where a value of 3.24 meters is relevant. It could be related to physics, engineering, or another scientific field where precise measurements are critical.

What does the "r" represent in the problem?

The "r" typically represents a radius or a distance in scientific equations. In this context, it likely refers to a specific distance or measurement that needs to be calculated or corrected.

Why is the distance of 3.24 meters significant?

The distance of 3.24 meters might be significant because it represents an error, a deviation, or a critical measurement in the problem. Understanding why this specific distance is "too far" would be essential to solving the problem accurately.

How do you approach solving for "r" in such problems?

To solve for "r," one would typically set up an equation based on the given information and apply relevant mathematical or physical principles. This might involve understanding the relationship between different variables and using algebraic methods to isolate and solve for "r."

What tools or methods are typically used to measure distances accurately in such scenarios?

Accurate distance measurements can be made using tools such as laser distance meters, measuring tapes, or more advanced instruments like total stations and GPS devices, depending on the required precision and context of the problem.

Back
Top