MHB Solving for Roots of a Cubic Equation Using Perturbation Theory

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding two-term expansions for the roots of the cubic equation x^3 + x^2 - w = 0, particularly for small values of w. One participant has identified one root near -1 and seeks guidance on determining the expansions for the other two roots, which are near 0 and 1. The conversation emphasizes the use of perturbation theory and suggests trial solutions involving powers of w to derive the correct asymptotic sequences. Participants clarify that the approach is not merely guessing but involves systematic trial solutions to find coefficients and exponents. The thread highlights the importance of understanding perturbation expansions in solving such equations.
Poirot1
Messages
243
Reaction score
0
Question: obtain 2-term expansions for the roots of x^3+x^2-w=0 , 0<w<<1.

I assumed an expansion of the form x=a+bw+... and from this obtained a=-1, b=1 as one solution. How do I work out the form of the other 2 expansions?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Poirot said:
Question: obtain 2-term expansions for the roots of x^3+x^2-w=0 , 0<w<<1.

I assumed an expansion of the form x=a+bw+... and from this obtained a=-1, b=1 as one solution. How do I work out the form of the other 2 expansions?

Thanks.

There are two roots near 0 and one root near 1, you have already dealt with than near 1. Then for the roots near 0 guess a trial solution: \(x=aw^k\) (which is a two term logarithmic expansion: \(\log(x)=A+B\log(w)\) ).

CB
 
Last edited:
sorry Captain Black, are you familiar with perturbation expansions? That is what I'm doing, I should have said the above solution as
x= -1+w+... as it is an infinite (perturbation) series. I want to know how to arrive at the correct asymptotic sequence.
 
Poirot said:
sorry Captain Black, are you familiar with perturbation expansions? That is what I'm doing, I should have said the above solution as
x= -1+w+... as it is an infinite (perturbation) series. I want to know how to arrive at the correct asymptotic sequence.

Sorry Poirot, are you familiar with singular perturbation expansions?

When you find the correct exponent for the trial solution you can use a perturbation expansion for \(a=a_0+a_1w^{k}+...\), where \(a_0\) is one or other of the two zeroth-order coefficients found using the trial solution.

CB
 
Last edited:
I take it you thought I was trying to be funny. Anyway, is there any way to arrive at the correct answer without just guessing?
 
Poirot said:
I take it you thought I was trying to be funny. Anyway, is there any way to arrive at the correct answer without just guessing?

It is not a guess. There can be no constant term since the root is going to zero as \(w\) goes to zero, so the simplest candidate is a multiple of some power of \(w\). Try the candidate , find the coefficient and exponent for an initial approximate solution and take it from there.

CB
 
Last edited:
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K