- #1

- 5,614

- 2,935

- TL;DR Summary
- The solution of ## x^3-x+.1=0 ## is of interest. A quick approximation to the 3 real roots is found. This is compared with the general solution that is found to the equation in the form ## x^3+px=q ##, using the substitution ## x=w-\frac{p}{3w} ##, (the standard way of solving this type of equation), and obtaining a quadratic in ## w^3 ##.

The equation ## x^3-x+.1=0 ##, has 3 real roots that can be quickly approximated as follows: Writing the equation ## x=.1+x^3 ##, iterative methods quickly indicate that there is a root ## r_1 ## near ## x=+.1 ##, and more accurately ## r_1 \approx + .101 ##. ## \\## Doing an approximate calculation of factoring out ## x-.1 ## from ## x^3-x+.1 ## yields ## (x-.1)(x^2+.1x-1 )=0 ## (approximately). ## \\ ## The quadratic formula can be quickly applied to the quadratic factor to give ## r_2 \approx +.95 ## and ## r_3 \approx -1.05 ##. ## \\ ## These results were found to be in agreement with the standard solution to this cubic equation using Vieta's substitution ## x=w-\frac{p}{3w} ##. ## \\ ## Here ## p=-1 ##, and ## q=-.1 ##, for the equation in the form ## x^3+px=q ##. ## \\ ## The substitution gives a quadratic in ## w^3 ## that is ## w^6-qw^3-\frac{p^3}{27}=0 ##. ## \\ ## The number ## w^3 \approx .192 e^{i (\theta +n 360^{\circ}) } ## where ## \theta \approx 105.1^{\circ} ## and ## \theta \approx 254.9^{\circ} ##, and ## n=0,1,2 ##. ## \\ ## The complex number ## w ## is then found as ## w= (.192)^{1/3} e^{i (\theta/3+n 120^{\circ})}=.577 e^{i (\theta/3+n 120^{\circ})} ##. ## \\ ## There are only 3 distinct ## w's ##. ## \\ ## When the computation is then made for ## x ## from ## w ##, the result is ## x=w+\frac{1}{3w}\approx 2(.577) \cos{\phi} ## , and ## x ## is real as it must be. The three roots ## x \approx .101, .95, -1.05 ## are then obtained as above. ## \\ ## Note: I could have kept more decimals in these calculations, but I did them mostly by hand, using Taylor series expansions, etc. to get them reasonably precise. The goal here was simply to show agreement with the very quick solution above.

Last edited: