Solving for the Height of a Rectangular Hyperbola

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the height of a rectangular hyperbola representing an arch that is 300m wide and reaches a maximum height of 100m. Participants clarify the coordinates of the vertices and points on the hyperbola, emphasizing the need for a vertical translation to ensure the arch's center is above the origin. There is debate over the accuracy of initial coordinates, with suggestions to adjust them for better alignment with the arch's physical properties. The conversation concludes with a call for assistance in deriving the correct equations based on the proposed coordinates. Overall, the thread seeks to resolve the algebraic approach to finding the arch's height at a specific distance from its ends.
zaddyzad
Messages
149
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An arch is the shape of a hyperbola. IF it s 300m wide at its base and has a maximum height of 100m, how high is the arch 30m from the end ?

Note: this is a rectangular hyperbola.

Homework Equations



(y-h)^2 - x^2 = a

The Attempt at a Solution



I determined the verticies is (0,0) and there are two points (-150,-100), (150,100) I also know that there must be a vertical translation for the centre to be higher than (0,0).

But what I can figure out is how to solve for h and a using two different coordinates. If someone could help me with the algebra that'd be awesome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zaddyzad said:
I determined the verticies is (0,0) and there are two points (-150,-100), (150,100) I also know that there must be a vertical translation for the centre to be higher than (0,0).
How do you get (-150,-100)? That would be underground, no? What about y when x = 300?
 
I'm trying to set it as easily as I can without a horizontal shift. However maybe a vertice of (0,100) and points (-150,0) and (150,0) would be better.
 
zaddyzad said:
I'm trying to set it as easily as I can without a horizontal shift. However maybe a vertice of (0,100) and points (-150,0) and (150,0) would be better.
Either way is fine, but I think you had the coordinates wrong in your first way. It looked like you had the origin on the ground at one end of the arch, right? So the y coord should never have been negative.
The set you propose now, with the arch endpoints symmetric about the origin, looks right. So, what equations do you get?
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K