MHB Solving for time in a hyperbolic trajectory

Click For Summary
The spacecraft is on a hyperbolic orbit with a semi-major axis of -35,000 km and an eccentricity of 1.2, transitioning from a true anomaly of 20° to 103°. The calculated elapsed time interval, Δt, between these two positions is approximately 4.15 days, which is significantly longer than the expected one hour. The solution involves determining the eccentric anomalies and using them to compute the mean anomalies, followed by the time calculations based on the specific hyperbolic equations. An alternative method suggested is to apply Kepler's third law, though it may not be applicable to all hyperbolic trajectories. The current solution is deemed correct despite the initial expectation of a shorter time interval.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
A spacecraft is on a hyperbolic orbit relative to the Earth with $a = -35000$ km and an eccentricity of $e = 1.2$.
At some initial time $t_0$, the spacecraft is at a true anomaly of $\nu_0 = 20^{\circ}$.
At some later time $t$, the true anomaly is $\nu = 103^{\circ}$.
What is the elapsed time interval $\Delta t$ between these two positions?

This solution is wrong. The answer should be around an hour. How else can I do this?

Since we are dealing with hyperbolic trajectories, our equations for the eccentric hyperbolic anomaly are
\begin{alignat*}{3}
M_{\text{h}} & = & \frac{\mu_{earth}}{h^3}(e^2 - 1)^{3/2}t\\
M_{\text{h}} & = & e\sinh(F) - F
\end{alignat*}
Therefore, we need the eccentric anomalies $F$ and $F_0$.
\begin{alignat*}{3}
F & = & 2\tanh^{-1}\left[\sqrt{\frac{e - 1}{e + 1}}\cdot\tan\left(\frac{\nu}{2}\right)\right]\\
& = & 41.51866^{\circ}\\
F_0 & = & 2\tanh^{-1}\left[\sqrt{\frac{e - 1}{e + 1}}\cdot\tan\left(\frac{\nu_0}{2}\right)\right]\\
& = & 6.08648^{\circ}
\end{alignat*}
Since we don't know $h$ explicitly, we can solve for $h$,
$$
h = \sqrt{a\cdot\mu_{earth}\cdot(1 - e^2)}.
$$
Next, we need to find the eccentric anomaly for $F_0$ and $F$.
\begin{alignat*}{3}
M_{F_0} & = & e\sinh(F_0) - F_0\\
& = & -5.95877^{\circ}\\
M_{F} & = & e\sinh(F_0) - F_0\\
& = & -40.5709^{\circ}\\
\end{alignat*}
Finally, we can solve for the time and take the difference to obtain $\Delta t$.
\begin{alignat*}{3}
t & = & M_F\cdot\frac{h^3}{\mu_{earth}\cdot(e^2 - 1)^{3/2}}\\
& = & -420773\text{ s}\\
t_0 & = & M_{F_0}\cdot\frac{h^3}{\mu_{earth}\cdot(e^2 - 1)^{3/2}}\\
& = & -61800.2\text{ s}
\end{alignat*}
Since time isn't negative, we simply take the absolute value of the $t$ and $t_0$.
\begin{alignat*}{3}
\Delta t & = & t - t_0\\
& = & 358973\text{ s}\\
& = & 4.15478\text{ days}
\end{alignat*}
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org

This solution is correct and provides the elapsed time interval between the two positions in the spacecraft's hyperbolic trajectory. If you are looking for a simpler or alternative method, you can also use Kepler's third law which states that the square of the orbital period is proportional to the cube of the semimajor axis. Using this, you can solve for the orbital period and then find the elapsed time interval between the two positions. However, this method may not work for all hyperbolic trajectories as they do not follow the same pattern as elliptical orbits.
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K