MHB Solving for x: Clearing Fractions or Finding Common Denominator?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dethrone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fractions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving inequalities and equations involving fractions, specifically the inequality $$\frac{x-2}{x-5}>\frac{x-3}{x-4}$$ and the equation $$\frac{1}{x-2}=\frac{3}{x+2}-\frac{6x}{(x+2)(x-2)}$$. Participants emphasize the importance of finding a common denominator to avoid sign changes that can lead to incorrect solutions. The consensus is that while clearing fractions can be quicker, it introduces potential extraneous solutions that must be checked. Ultimately, the safest approach is to manipulate the expressions carefully to maintain the integrity of the solutions.
Dethrone
Messages
716
Reaction score
0
Given:

$$\frac{x-2}{x-5}>\frac{x-3}{x-4}$$

How I would normally solve it is to bring everything over to one side and find a common denominator. The answer of which is $x>5$

Now a commentary on this question says to "watch out" for sign changes if you multiply both sides by an expression, so I decided to try it out:

If $x>4$:
$$\frac{(x-2)(x-4)}{x-5}>x-3$$

If $x>5$ and $x>4$:
$$(x-2)(x-4)>(x-3)(x-5)$$

Solving gives us $x>5$, which is the same as above.

Question: Is it just a lucky coincidence that the restriction I applied on the second step $x>4$ just HAPPENED to SATISFY our answer, or could the answer have been say $x<3$ and dividing both sides would have eliminated that solution?

Question 2:

$$\frac{1}{x-2}=\frac{3}{x+2}-\frac{6x}{(x+2)(x-2)}$$

To begin this problem, would you attempt to "clear the fraction" by multiplying by (x-2)(x+2)? I always get paranoid about doing it, because it introduces the solution $x=\pm 2$, which you will then have to replug back into the original equation to confirm, right?

Would attempting to find a common denominator and bring everything to one side be a smarter approach? Or should just clearing the fraction, which is much faster, be preferred? It's just that the latter requires that you resubstitute back into the original equation, whereas the former doesn't require resubstitution. Thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Rido12 said:
Given:

$$\frac{x-2}{x-5}>\frac{x-3}{x-4}$$

How I would normally solve it is to bring everything over to one side and find a common denominator. The answer of which is $x>5$

Now a commentary on this question says to "watch out" for sign changes if you multiply both sides by an expression, so I decided to try it out:

If $x>4$:
$$\frac{(x-2)(x-4)}{x-5}>x-3$$

If $x>5$ and $x>4$:
$$(x-2)(x-4)>(x-3)(x-5)$$

Solving gives us $x>5$, which is the same as above.

Question: Is it just a lucky coincidence that the restriction I applied on the second step $x>4$ just HAPPENED to SATISFY our answer, or could the answer have been say $x<3$ and dividing both sides would have eliminated that solution?

What You're saying is true in part. Assuming x <4 the inequality is verified for $\frac{7}{2} < x <4$ ...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Rido12 said:
Given:

$$\frac{x-2}{x-5}>\frac{x-3}{x-4}$$

How I would normally solve it is to bring everything over to one side and find a common denominator.
I think that this is definitely the safest strategy. In this case, you would get $$\frac{x-2}{x-5} - \frac{x-3}{x-4} > 0,$$ $$\frac{(x-2)(x-4) - (x-3)(x-5)}{(x-4)(x-5)} > 0,$$ $$\frac{2x-7}{(x-4)(x-5)} > 0.$$ That expression changes sign when any of the linear factors in the numerator or denominator changes sign, telling you that the critical points are when $x = \frac72,\ 4,\ 5$ (as chisigma has pointed out).

Rido12 said:
Question 2:

$$\frac{1}{x-2}=\frac{3}{x+2}-\frac{6x}{(x+2)(x-2)}$$

To begin this problem, would you attempt to "clear the fraction" by multiplying by (x-2)(x+2)? I always get paranoid about doing it, because it introduces the solution $x=\pm 2$, which you will then have to replug back into the original equation to confirm, right?
This is an equation rather than an inequality, so in this case there is nothing to be lost by multiplying by $(x-2)(x+2)$ (except that you have to remember that $x=\pm 2$ cannot be solutions).
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top