Solving Friction Problem: Box on Ground, Force Applied

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter terence1732
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanics of friction involving two boxes placed on the ground, one on top of the other, and the effects of applied forces on their movement. Participants explore concepts related to static friction, the interaction between the boxes, and the implications of external forces in both scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the friction on the box will equal the applied force of 2N and whether this friction will also act on the Earth, leading to potential movement of the Earth.
  • Another participant agrees that the friction on the box will be 2N if the box does not move, but notes that the Earth will move slightly if the force is external to it, suggesting that the friction force on the box will be slightly less than 2N.
  • A new scenario is introduced where one box is placed on top of another with no friction between the ground and the lower box. A participant asks if both boxes will move together when a 2N force is applied to the lower box, and if the friction between the boxes would then be 1N.
  • Another participant confirms that the boxes will move together and that only 1N of friction is required, which is within the static friction limit of 5N.
  • There is a discussion about the force needed to cause relative movement between the boxes, with one participant suggesting that it should be greater than 10N, which is confirmed by another participant who explains the relationship between force, acceleration, and static friction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the mechanics of friction and the conditions under which the boxes will move together or slip. However, there is some uncertainty regarding the exact nature of the forces and the implications of the applied forces in different scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion over the relationship between applied forces and frictional forces, particularly in the context of static friction limits and the conditions required for relative movement between the boxes.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students or individuals interested in understanding the principles of friction, Newton's laws of motion, and the interactions between objects under applied forces in a physics context.

terence1732
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
As follows,
a box is placed on the ground
And let the limiting static friction be 5N
for instance an external force 2N is applied to the box
Then, will the friction on the box be 2N?
if yes, then .. there will be a friction of 2N on the earth? causes they are action and rxn pair
And will the Earth move but the box will not move?

or will the box and the Earth just share the 2N force and move together? the friction between them is not exactly 2N but much smaller then it?
But, in this way, a much greater applied force (>5N) will be needed to cause relative movement

I just can't find out what i am missing.
Pls help thanks a lot
 
Physics news on Phys.org
terence1732 said:
As follows,
a box is placed on the ground
And let the limiting static friction be 5N
for instance an external force 2N is applied to the box
Then, will the friction on the box be 2N?
Yes.
if yes, then .. there will be a friction of 2N on the earth? causes they are action and rxn pair
Yes.
And will the Earth move but the box will not move?

or will the box and the Earth just share the 2N force and move together? the friction between them is not exactly 2N but much smaller then it?
Whether the Earth accelerates or not depends on the net force. If the 2N force is external to the earth, then box and Earth will move together. Note that the acceleration will be miniscule, but it implies that the friction force on the box will be slightly less than 2N. (Newton's 2nd law.)
But, in this way, a much greater applied force (>5N) will be needed to cause relative movement
No, just a tiny bit greater than 5N. (Way too small to ever measure or notice! This is just a theoretical point.)
 
Thank for your help
But now I hv another problem..
A case as follows,
Now I place a box (1kg) on the ground.
Assume there's no friction between the ground and this box.

And I place another box (also 1 kg) above this box
The limiting static friction between this two box is 5N

And now external force of 2N is applied to the lower box
Will they move together?
If yes, then the friction between the box surface should be 1N?

And I want to cause a relative movement between boxes,
should the external force be greater then 10N?

It seems that it is quite strange..
 
terence1732 said:
And now external force of 2N is applied to the lower box
Will they move together?
If yes, then the friction between the box surface should be 1N?
Right. The surfaces will resist slipping until they reach the static friction limit. In this case only 1 N of friction is required, which is well within the limit.
And I want to cause a relative movement between boxes,
should the external force be greater then 10N?
Right. You need to create a situation where more force is required to accelerate the block than static friction can provide. In this case, that means an acceleration of 5 m/s^2, which requires a force of 10 N. (Once the upper block begins to slip, less force will be required to maintain slipping since static friction will be replaced by kinetic friction.)
It seems that it is quite strange..
Strange but true. :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K