Solving Gauss's Law Problem: Excess Electrons in Plastic Sphere

  • Thread starter Thread starter A.J.710
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gauss's law Law
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The problem involves calculating the number of excess electrons required to create an electric field of 1250 N/C just outside a plastic sphere with a diameter of 23.0 cm. Using the equation E = Q / (4 * π * ε * r²), the charge was initially calculated as 7.353 x 10^-9 C. Upon dividing this charge by the elementary charge (1.602 x 10^-19 C), the result was approximately 45,904,610,632 electrons. The error arose from using the diameter instead of the radius in the calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law
  • Familiarity with electric fields and charge calculations
  • Knowledge of the relationship between charge and the number of electrons
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Gauss's Law applications in electrostatics
  • Learn about electric field calculations for spherical charge distributions
  • Study the concept of electric field strength and its units
  • Explore common mistakes in physics problem-solving related to dimensional analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone interested in solving electrostatic problems involving charge distribution and electric fields.

A.J.710
Messages
56
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



How many excess electrons must be distributed uniformly within the volume of an isolated plastic sphere 23.0cm in diameter to produce an electric field of 1250N/C just outside the surface of the sphere?

Homework Equations



E=Q/4*pi*ε*r^2


The Attempt at a Solution



I've attempted to find the charge using that equation and got 7.353*10^-9. Then to find the number of electrons I did 7.353*10^-9/1.602*10^-19 and I get 45904610632 electrons. It keeps saying I am wrong and I can't figure out why. Can anyone please tell me if I am doing something wrong.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
NEVERMIND. They threw in 23cm as the diameter and not the radius...
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K