Solving Homogeneous System of 3 Equations & 4 Variables

  • Thread starter Thread starter scientifico
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homogeneous System
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a homogeneous system of three equations with four variables. The original poster presents a set of equations and notes that the determinant of the coefficient matrix is zero, raising questions about the applicability of Cramer's Rule in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of a zero determinant and question the use of Cramer's Rule. Some suggest that the original poster's assumption of treating one variable as known may not be necessary, while others emphasize the importance of row reduction for determining the number of free variables.

Discussion Status

There is a recognition that Cramer's Rule is not applicable due to the zero determinant. Participants have offered guidance to use row reduction instead, and there is an ongoing exploration of the nature of the solutions to the system.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the system consists of three equations and four unknowns, which inherently suggests the possibility of free variables. The discussion highlights the limitations of applying certain methods due to the structure of the equations.

scientifico
Messages
181
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm solving out a homogeneous 3 equations and 4 variables system so I considered one variable as known term but the determinant of the matrix is 0, how do I use Cramer in this case ?
these are the 3 equations

2x + 3y - z - 2v = 0
4x - 3y - 5z + 5v = 0
8x + 3y - 7z + v = 0

determinant of {{2,3,-1},{4,-3,-5},{8,3,-7}} is 0

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
scientifico said:
Hi,
I'm solving out a homogeneous 3 equations and 4 variables system so I considered one variable as known term but the determinant of the matrix is 0, how do I use Cramer in this case ?
these are the 3 equations

2x + 3y - z - 2v = 0
4x - 3y - 5z + 5v = 0
8x + 3y - 7z + v = 0

determinant of {{2,3,-1},{4,-3,-5},{8,3,-7}} is 0

thanks

The normal way to solve a system like this would be to use row reduction.
 
but how can I solve it with Cramer ?
 
scientifico said:
Hi,
I'm solving out a homogeneous 3 equations and 4 variables system so I considered one variable as known term but the determinant of the matrix is 0, how do I use Cramer in this case ?
these are the 3 equations
I don't think there is any reason that you should assume that one variable is known. This is apparently a system of three equations in four unknowns. The matrix of coefficients isn't square, so the concept of the determinant doesn't apply, and you can't use Cramer's Rule.
scientifico said:
2x + 3y - z - 2v = 0
4x - 3y - 5z + 5v = 0
8x + 3y - 7z + v = 0

determinant of {{2,3,-1},{4,-3,-5},{8,3,-7}} is 0

thanks
 
scientifico said:
but how can I solve it with Cramer ?
As already noted, Cramer's Rule doesn't apply here. Follow the advice that LCKurtz gave.
 
Also note that it isn't obvious just looking at the system whether there might be 1 or more free variables. You really need row reduction to answer that.
 
scientifico said:
Hi,
I'm solving out a homogeneous 3 equations and 4 variables system so I considered one variable as known term but the determinant of the matrix is 0, how do I use Cramer in this case ?
these are the 3 equations

2x + 3y - z - 2v = 0
4x - 3y - 5z + 5v = 0
8x + 3y - 7z + v = 0

determinant of {{2,3,-1},{4,-3,-5},{8,3,-7}} is 0

thanks

Cramer's rule only applies when the determinant of coefficients is nonzero. No matter which column you omit, the resulting 3x3 matrix has zero determinant, so in this question Cramer's Rule fails in every single case you try.

As others have suggested, just use row reduction; but an equivalent description would be: just use the variable-elimination method as taught in high school.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K