MHB Solving Inequality: 0 <= 6x3 - 24x2 + 6x - 10

  • Thread starter Thread starter ATroelstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
ATroelstein
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I am trying to solve the following inequality:

x3 <= 7x3 - 24x2 + 6x - 10

I have worked it out as follows:

0 <= 6x3 - 24x2 + 6x - 10

10 <= 6x3 - 24x2 + 6x

10 <= 6x(x2 - 4x + 1)

At this point, I'm not sure how to proceed and I'm not sure if the factoring on the last step was helpful. Any advice on how to proceed would be appreciated. Thank you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
ATroelstein said:
I am trying to solve the following inequality:

x3 <= 7x3 - 24x2 + 6x - 10

I have worked it out as follows:

0 <= 6x3 - 24x2 + 6x - 10

10 <= 6x3 - 24x2 + 6x

10 <= 6x(x2 - 4x + 1)

At this point, I'm not sure how to proceed and I'm not sure if the factoring on the last step was helpful. Any advice on how to proceed would be appreciated. Thank you.

I would leave it in the form below and solve the LHS and use the real roots of the cubic equation to get intervals to test on.
$6x^3 - 24x^2+ 6x - 10 \geq 0$
$3x^3 - 12x^2+3x-5 \geq 0$

It doesn't look like this one factors easily so you might have to use technology to find the real root(s)
 
ATroelstein said:
I am trying to solve the following inequality:

x3 <= 7x3 - 24x2 + 6x - 10

I have worked it out as follows:

0 <= 6x3 - 24x2 + 6x - 10
You are fine to here.

10 <= 6x3 - 24x2 + 6x
There is never any good reason to shift that constant to the other side. Knowing that "xy= A" where A is non-zero doesn't tell you anything.
Instead, not that you can divide both sides by the positive number, 2, to get 0<= 3x3- 12x2+ 3x- 5

Now, the only possible rational roots are 5, -5, 1/3, -1/2, 5/3, and -5/3 and it is easy to that none of those are roots. The only root is irrational. Graphing gives a root just a little larger than -1. And the inequality is true for x less than that number.

10 <= 6x(x2 - 4x + 1)

At this point, I'm not sure how to proceed and I'm not sure if the factoring on the last step was helpful. Any advice on how to proceed would be appreciated. Thank you.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top