MHB Solving Inequality: 0 <= 6x3 - 24x2 + 6x - 10

  • Thread starter Thread starter ATroelstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Click For Summary
To solve the inequality 0 <= 6x^3 - 24x^2 + 6x - 10, the expression can be simplified to 3x^3 - 12x^2 + 3x - 5 >= 0. Factoring may not be straightforward, and it is suggested to find the real roots using technology, as the rational root theorem indicates no simple rational roots exist. Graphing the function reveals that the only root is slightly greater than -1, indicating the inequality holds for values of x less than this root. The discussion emphasizes the importance of testing intervals based on the identified roots to determine where the inequality is satisfied.
ATroelstein
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I am trying to solve the following inequality:

x3 <= 7x3 - 24x2 + 6x - 10

I have worked it out as follows:

0 <= 6x3 - 24x2 + 6x - 10

10 <= 6x3 - 24x2 + 6x

10 <= 6x(x2 - 4x + 1)

At this point, I'm not sure how to proceed and I'm not sure if the factoring on the last step was helpful. Any advice on how to proceed would be appreciated. Thank you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
ATroelstein said:
I am trying to solve the following inequality:

x3 <= 7x3 - 24x2 + 6x - 10

I have worked it out as follows:

0 <= 6x3 - 24x2 + 6x - 10

10 <= 6x3 - 24x2 + 6x

10 <= 6x(x2 - 4x + 1)

At this point, I'm not sure how to proceed and I'm not sure if the factoring on the last step was helpful. Any advice on how to proceed would be appreciated. Thank you.

I would leave it in the form below and solve the LHS and use the real roots of the cubic equation to get intervals to test on.
$6x^3 - 24x^2+ 6x - 10 \geq 0$
$3x^3 - 12x^2+3x-5 \geq 0$

It doesn't look like this one factors easily so you might have to use technology to find the real root(s)
 
ATroelstein said:
I am trying to solve the following inequality:

x3 <= 7x3 - 24x2 + 6x - 10

I have worked it out as follows:

0 <= 6x3 - 24x2 + 6x - 10
You are fine to here.

10 <= 6x3 - 24x2 + 6x
There is never any good reason to shift that constant to the other side. Knowing that "xy= A" where A is non-zero doesn't tell you anything.
Instead, not that you can divide both sides by the positive number, 2, to get 0<= 3x3- 12x2+ 3x- 5

Now, the only possible rational roots are 5, -5, 1/3, -1/2, 5/3, and -5/3 and it is easy to that none of those are roots. The only root is irrational. Graphing gives a root just a little larger than -1. And the inequality is true for x less than that number.

10 <= 6x(x2 - 4x + 1)

At this point, I'm not sure how to proceed and I'm not sure if the factoring on the last step was helpful. Any advice on how to proceed would be appreciated. Thank you.
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K