Solving Infinite Series: Does (-1^n)/5 Converge?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence of the infinite series defined by the terms \((-1)^n/5\) from \(n=1\) to infinity. Participants explore whether this series converges and what it might converge to, questioning the nature of convergence and divergence in the context of oscillating sums.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine the definition of convergence in relation to the series, discussing the behavior of partial sums and the implications of oscillation. Questions arise about the interpretation of the series and the conditions under which it may be considered divergent.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with multiple interpretations being explored regarding the convergence of the series. Some participants provide insights into the oscillating nature of the partial sums, while others question the sufficiency of certain reasoning for establishing divergence.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the behavior of the nth term as \(n\) approaches infinity, with participants noting that the terms do not approach zero, which is a critical aspect of the convergence criteria being discussed.

pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



IS=infinite series from n=1 to infinity

Does this IS(((-1)^n)/5) converge? But if it did what would it converge to? There is certainly nothing infinite about this sum value but if it doesn't converge to any specific number than does it mean it is divergent?


I think yes.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When in doubt, go back to the definition! The sum of an infinite series is defined as the limit of the sequence of its partial sums, if that sequence converges. An infinite series converges if and only if its sequence of partial sums converges.

In this case the sum is -1/5+ 1/5- 1/5+ 1/5+ ... The partial sums are -1/5, -1/5+ 1/5= 0, -1/5+ 1/5- 1/5= -1/5, -1/5+ 1/5- 1/5+ 1/5= 0, etc. In other words, the sequence of partial sums is -1/5, 0, -1/5, 0, -1/5, 0, ... While that sequence does not go to infinity, it is "oscillating" and still does not converge. Therefore, the infinite sum does not converge.

Neither a sequence nor a series has to "go to infinity" in order to be divergent.
 
Is this the series you want to test: [tex]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}{\frac{(-1)^n}{5}}[/tex]
?

If so, I think it would depend on how you interpret the sum -1+1-1+1-1...-1+1-1...
 
neutrino said:
Is this the series you want to test: [tex]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}{\frac{(-1)^n}{5}}[/tex]
?

If so, I think it would depend on how you interpret the sum -1+1-1+1-1...-1+1-1...
Fortunately the definition of "infinite series" tells us how to interpret it!
 
RIght so now what about [tex]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}{\frac{(-1)^n}{5+\frac{3}{n}}}[/tex]

When n is large we get back to [tex]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}{\frac{(-1)^n}{5}}[/tex] which is divergent so the above series is divergent. But is this reason good enough to extablish the divergence of this series?
 
HallsofIvy said:
Fortunately the definition of "infinite series" tells us how to interpret it!
Sorry. Major brain lapse. :blushing:
 
pivoxa15 said:
RIght so now what about [tex]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}{\frac{(-1)^n}{5+\frac{3}{n}}}[/tex]

When n is large we get back to [tex]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}{\frac{(-1)^n}{5}}[/tex] which is divergent so the above series is divergent. But is this reason good enough to extablish the divergence of this series?

Well, does the nth term of the series go to 0 as n goes to infinity?
 
Mystic998 said:
Well, does the nth term of the series go to 0 as n goes to infinity?

The nth term when n goes to infinity is not 0 which is sufficent for the series to diverge.
 
I think Mystic998 Knew that pivoxa15, but wanted to actually know if it actually does go to zero.

Mystic998 - As you can see, there are only 2 values the terms can take, -1/5 and 1/5. Neither of these are zero, so even though we haven't calculated the limit, we know it isn't zero :)
 
  • #10
There's a different type of "convergence" when you have a series that does that, because the series value will oscillate around some fixed "average", but in the most common definition of convergence, said series doesn't converge.
 
  • #11
I think Mystic988 knew perfectly well that it didn't go to 0 and suggesting a way for pivoxa15 to determine that the series didn't converge!
 
  • #12
The fact that Mystic988's sentence started with 'Well...' implies he/she knew the answer and wanted to give me a clue by asking me a question. I took it as a clue and found the correct answer as posted in post 8.
 
  • #13
>.< Sorry I didn't realize it was pivoxa15's question ..I thought he was just another poster trying to help, my bad.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
20K