Solving Integral Identity: Gradstein & Ryzhik

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter romeo6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Integral
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around an integral identity related to dimensional regularization, specifically an expression involving a derivative with respect to a parameter \( s \) and a k-integral. Participants are examining the formulation and potential references for the identity, particularly whether it is sourced from Gradstein and Ryzhik.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an integral identity involving a derivative with respect to \( s \) and a k-integral, questioning its origin.
  • Another participant points out a potential inconsistency in the expression, noting that \( s \) appears on both sides of the equation and should be clarified.
  • A third participant acknowledges a modification to the expression and confirms that it is now correct.
  • There is a request for clarification regarding the notation used for the k-integral.
  • A participant provides a link to a paper that contains the relevant equation, suggesting it may be the source of the identity.
  • One participant expresses a desire for further engagement or responses from others.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the identity's formulation, and there are competing views regarding the correct interpretation of the expression and its parameters.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved issues regarding the consistency of the expression, particularly the treatment of the parameter \( s \) in the context of the derivative and the integral. The discussion also relies on the specific definitions and assumptions related to dimensional regularization.

romeo6
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hey folks!

I'm trying to figure out an identity from a paper on dimensional regularization.

Here's the identity:

[tex]-\frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{ds}|_{s=0}\int_0^\infty \frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4}(k^2+m^2)^{-s}[/tex]

after performing the k-integral this becomes:

[tex]=-\frac{1}{32\pi^2}\frac{d}{ds}|_{s=-2}\frac{1}{s(s+1)}m^{-2s}[/tex]

I found this in a paper with no references. Is this perhaps something out of Gradstein and Ryzhik?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a problem with the expression you've written. s appears on the left hand side, but on the right hand side it looks like after taking the derivative you're setting all the s's to 2. If s appears as a variable/parameter on the left hand side it has to appear on the right hand side, so presumably at least one of the s's on the right hand side is the same as on the left hand side. (or the s on the left hand side should be a 2). If you could clarify this it would be of some help.
 
Hi Mute - I think I was modifying the expression while you were kindly looking at it. This one's good.
 
By "k-integral" do you mean this:
[tex]-\frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{ds}|_{s=0}\int_0^\infty \frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4}(k^2+m^2)^{-s} dk[/tex]
?
I suppose this makes more sense:
[tex]-\frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{ds}|_{s=0}\int_0^\infty \frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4}(k^2+m^2)^{-s} ds[/tex]
 
...anyone?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K