Solving Laplace Transform of sin[3t] ( h[t - pi/2] - h[t] )

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the Laplace transform of the function sin[3t] (h[t - pi/2] - h[t]), where h represents the Heaviside function. The correct Laplace transform is established as -1/(s^2 + 9) * (3 + se^( (pi * s) / 2 )). Participants clarify the limits of integration, emphasizing that the function is only valid for 0 <= t <= pi/2, which deviates from the standard Laplace transform definition that extends from 0 to infinity. The conversation also touches on the use of LaTeX for mathematical notation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace transforms and their definitions
  • Familiarity with the Heaviside step function
  • Basic knowledge of integration techniques
  • Proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Laplace transform, including time-shifting and scaling
  • Learn how to apply the Heaviside function in Laplace transforms
  • Explore integration techniques specific to piecewise functions
  • Research LaTeX commands for mathematical notation
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and professionals in engineering, mathematics, and physics who are working with Laplace transforms and need to understand the application of the Heaviside function in specific limits.

splitendz
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hi. I'm trying to find the Laplace transform of:

sin[3t] ( h[t - pi/2] - h[t] )

I realize that this function is only valid for 0 <= t <= pi/2.

Since the limit is not from zero to infinity (0 to pi/2 instead) how can I use the laplace tranform definition to solve this?

Also, does anyone know how to insert mathematical symbols in your post?

Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes,use the LaTex code.Type the code using [ tex ] [ /tex ] (without the spacings) and the compiler will do the rest.

That "h" is Heaviside's distribution,right...?

Daniel.
 
Yes, the h is the heaviside function. The correct answer to the problem is -1/(s^2 + 9) * (3 + se^( (pi * s) / 2 ). I can get -3/(s^2 + 9) but not sure how they get (3 + se^( (pi * s) / 2 ) for the next term.

Do you know where I can get a list of LaTex commands?
 
Are you trying to compute

\mathcal{L}\left\{ \sin (3t) [u_{t - \pi}(t) - u_0(t)] \right\}?
 
The question that I'm asking is:

\mathcal{L}\left\{ \sin (3t) [ h(t - \pi/2) - h(t) ] \right\}

Heaviside function definition is:

h(t - a)=\left\{\begin{array}{cc}0,&amp;\mbox{ if }<br /> t&lt; a\\1, &amp; \mbox{ if } t\geq a\end{array}\right.

I hope this makes it clearer to understand...
 
Isn't that \mathcal{L}\left(-\sin 3t\right) with t\in\left[0,\frac{\pi}{2}\left)...?

Daniel.
 
Yes, it is but it's the next step that confuses me.

Laplace transform is defined as

\int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-st} f(t) dt


Since we have a different limit how do we transform the function \mathcal{L}\left(-\sin 3t\right) for t\in\left[0,\frac{\pi}{2}\left)? I've only been learning laplace for 2 days so I'm a bit vauge, sorry if I'm asking a boring question :)
 
I don't see any problem

f(t)=\left\{\begin{array}{c}0 \ \mbox{if} \ t&lt;0\\ -\sin 3t \ \mbox{if} \ t\in\left[0,\frac{\pi}{2}\right) \\ 0 \ \mbox{if} \ t&gt;\frac{\pi}{2} \end{array}\right

Daniel.
 
  • #10
I understand that part. It's the actual integral that I need to evaluate that I'm not sure about.

-\int_{0}^{\pi / 2} e^{-st} \sin 3t dt Can i just do that or must the integration limits be between zero and inifinity to transform the function?
 
  • #11
The branch function is defined on R and splitting the integral on R into 3 integrals on each interval,you'll run into that integral.


Daniel.
 
  • #12
splitendz said:
Laplace transform is defined as

\int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-st}f(t)dt

If you really want to integrate from 0 to inf, I think you could rewrite

\sin(3t)u(t-\frac{\pi}{2})=-\cos(3(t-\frac{\pi}{2})u(t-\frac{\pi}{2})

Then use the time shifting property which says that

\mathcal{L}(f(t-t_0))=e^{-st_0}\mathcal{L}(f(t))

Now you just have to transform sin(3t) and cos(3t).

You could probably also use the differentiation property and time scaling so you would only have to actually transform sin(t).
 
  • #13
I'm afraid it doesn't work,unless that "3" was missing from the argument of cosine.

Daniel.
 
  • #14
Oops, my mistake.

Why is that though? It doesn't seem like messing with the time scaling of the step function should matter provided they both turn on at the same time. Isn't u(5t) the same as u(t). Actually, does u(5t) even make any sense?
 
  • #15
Yes,i guess you're right.The function should be the same,as i depicted in post #9.

Daniel.

P.S.Just wondering,what's your brother's name...?
 
  • #16
Thanks for your help :]
 
  • #17
dextercioby said:
P.S.Just wondering,what's your brother's name...?
When pronounced incorrectly, his name is similar to that of a certain throat lozenge.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K