Solving Laplace's Equation with Mass

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter homology
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving a modified form of Laplace's equation, specifically the equation \(\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}r^2\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial r}+\mu^2 \phi=0\), which arises in contexts where a photon is considered to have mass. Participants confirm that solutions are linear combinations of \(e^{\pm\mu r}/r\) and suggest substituting \(\psi = r \phi\) to simplify the differential equation into a second-order form. The conversation highlights the importance of coordinate systems, noting that cylindrical and spherical coordinates introduce factors of \(1/r\) or \(1/r^2\) due to the geometric nature of the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations, particularly second-order equations.
  • Familiarity with Laplace's equation and its applications in physics.
  • Knowledge of cylindrical and spherical coordinate systems.
  • Basic concepts of mass-energy equivalence in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and solutions of Laplace's equation in cylindrical coordinates.
  • Explore the implications of mass in electromagnetic theory and its mathematical representation.
  • Learn about the method of separation of variables for solving partial differential equations.
  • Investigate the physical significance of solutions to differential equations in quantum mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students studying differential equations, particularly those interested in electromagnetic theory and the mathematical modeling of physical phenomena involving mass.

homology
Messages
305
Reaction score
1
Hi folks, I'm drawing a blank on the following:

<br /> \frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}r^2\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial r}+\mu^2 \phi=0<br />

I 'know' the solutions which are linear combinations of e^{\pm\mu r}/r as you can check, but I've been trying to see if I could show the fact (as opposed to just checking that it works, which it does).

Context: The above, as I'm sure you realize, is 'almost' Laplace's equation. "If" a photon had mass (the term \mu would be proportional to it) the above equation would result for a region with no charge.

I'm guessing that the answer is simple so please be vague with your hints (I suppose that's almost asking for a smartass comment) as I'd like to figure it out myself.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Expand the differentials so you have a 2nd order equation.

Then substitute \psi = r \phi
 
AlephZero said:
Expand the differentials so you have a 2nd order equation.

Then substitute \psi = r \phi

awesome! was that inspired by experience or a general rule of thumb?
 
You said the solution was something like e^{kr}/r. I know how to solve a DE with solutions like e^{kr} so factoring out the r seemed like a good thing to try :smile:

In cylindrical and spherical coordinates, solutions often have a factor of 1/r or 1/r^2 compared with cartesian coordinates, because they represent something being spread out over a plane or solid angle, compared with a strip of constant width.

The DEs often have the form 1/r^n d/dr (r^n times something) as well.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
599
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K