Solving Logarithmic Equations: Analytical Method

joo
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
What is the analytical method for solving log. eqs., like x=2^x/14 ?

In high school they only teach us the graphical approach =/

joo
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What I meant was x=(2^x)/14, but I guess that doesn't really change the principle.

Thanks, I'll take a look at it, although I find myself doubtful.
 
There is no analytical solution to your problem. One can express the solutions using the product log function, but that is just another way of writing it, not a true analytic solution.
 
Welcome to PF, joo! :smile:In university they still use the graphical approach. ;)

In addition they use approximation algorithms, like the method of Newton-Raphson (which is based on a Taylor series expansion).

It's only the really bold ones in math that use the Lambert W function, which is a function that has only been invented to be able to write the solution to your equation.
As far as I know, no one really uses it.

The first solution for your equation is ##x=-{W(-\frac 1 {14} \ln(2)) \over \ln(2)} \approx 0.07525##.
 
Last edited:
I like Serena said:
Welcome to PF, joo! :smile:


In university they still use the graphical approach. ;)

In addition they use approximation algorithms, like the method of Newton-Raphson (which is based on a Taylor series expansion).

It's only the really bold ones in math that use the Lambert W function, which is a function that has only been invented to be able to write the solution to your equation.
As far as I know, no one really uses it.

(HUMOR)

But Lambert used it and they made a movie on his life among sheep:



(/HUMOR)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jedishrfu said:
(HUMOR)

But Lambert used it and they made a movie on his life among sheep:



(/HUMOR)


Oh! So the W comes from Walt Disney! :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you for your replies ! I'll stick to the graphical solving for now then, since I will have no access to any calculators during my tests.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top