Solving Logarithms: Find Where You're Going Wrong

  • Thread starter Thread starter answerseeker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithms
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving logarithmic equations, specifically focusing on the equation log_3 (2x+3) - log_3(X+1) = 2. Participants are exploring the properties of logarithms and their application in solving the equation, as well as discussing the graphing of logarithmic functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to manipulate the logarithmic equation by moving terms and applying properties of logarithms but expresses confusion about the correctness of their steps. Other participants suggest using logarithmic properties to combine logs and raise the base to eliminate the logarithm. Additionally, a participant discusses the process of graphing logarithmic functions and the procedure for finding inverses.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing clarifications on logarithmic properties and graphing techniques. Some guidance has been offered regarding the manipulation of logarithmic expressions and the importance of determining if a function is one-to-one before finding its inverse.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of logarithmic properties and their applications, as well as the nuances of graphing logarithmic functions. There is an indication of uncertainty regarding the steps taken in solving the original equation and the graphing process.

answerseeker
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I can't seem to find where I am going wrong on this Question. it asks to solve:

log_3 (2x+3) - log_3(X+1) = 2 where _3 is the base of 3 for log

so far i moved the log_3(x+1) to the right side of equal sign. then i moved the 2 up as an exponent:

log_3(2x+3) = log_3(x+1)^2 then i canceled the logs out and moved the 2 back down so its :

2x+3 = 2(x+1)

then distributed the 2 to the x+1 , but then the x's cancel.

i think that maybe i should have just left it as (x+1)^2 ? is that where I am going wrong? or do i actually have to divide 2x+3 by x+1 instead of moving the log_3(x+1) over?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Logarithms have the property that log(a)-log(b)=log(a/b) if they have the same base. So you do this to combine the logs, next you undo the logs by raising the base of the log to the power of both each side i.e. if log(a/b)=c where c is a constant then a/b=k^c where k is the base of the log. After this it is a matter of algebra.
 
okay, that's much clearer, thnx.
now I'm a bit confused on how to graph logs.
log_5(y+2)=x+1

What I did, changed the whole equation into Exponential Form. I then graphed that and then switched the X and Y coordinates.

Is that the correct procedure? Do I only interchange the X and Y coordinates once? <not once and the beginning then again after graphing?>
 
When you switch the y and the x cooridinates to find a solution by graphing, solve for y. Or in other words, find the inverse of the function, and before you do that find out if the function is one-to-one.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K