Solving Math Induction: Step-by-Step Guide

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter delc1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of mathematical induction, specifically focusing on a problem involving the expression \( n(n^2 + 5) \) and its divisibility by 3. Participants seek clarification on the step-by-step process of proving statements using induction, including the base case and the inductive step.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests help with a mathematical induction problem, specifically asking for a step-by-step solution.
  • Another participant presents a formulation of the problem, stating that \( 3 | \{n(n^2 + 5)\} \) implies \( n(n^2 + 5) = 3k \) and attempts to show that the expression holds for \( n+1 \).
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the inductive step, indicating that while they understand the base case, the transition to the inductive step is challenging.
  • A suggestion is made to clarify the induction hypothesis and to outline the proof structure, emphasizing the need to show that if the statement holds for \( n \), it must also hold for \( n+1 \).
  • Another participant proposes a method to approach the inductive step by considering the difference \( f(n+1) - f(n) \) and suggests that this could lead to completing the proof.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of rewriting the assumption in a recognizable form to facilitate the proof process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need for a clear understanding of the induction process, but there is no consensus on the specific steps or methods to apply in this particular problem. Multiple approaches and levels of understanding are evident, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the need for clarity in stating the induction hypothesis and the importance of recognizing parts of the expression that relate to the assumption. There are indications of missing assumptions or steps in the reasoning that have not been fully articulated.

delc1
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Could anyone please help with this question regarding mathematical induction;

View attachment 2667

step by step procedure/ solution would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    8.5 KB · Views: 120
Physics news on Phys.org
delc1 said:
Could anyone please help with this question regarding mathematical induction;

View attachment 2667

step by step procedure/ solution would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

Let suppose that...

$\displaystyle 3| \{n\ (n^{2} + 5)\} \implies n\ (n^{2} + 5) = 3\ k\ (1)$

In thi case is...

$\displaystyle (n+1)\ (n^{2} + 2\ n + 6) = n^{3} + 5\ n + 3\ n^{2} + 3\ n + 6 = 3\ k + 3\ n^{2} + 3\ n + 6 \ (2)$

... and clearly 3 devides the (2). For n=1 $\displaystyle n\ (n^{2} + 5) = 6$ so that...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Still not quite sure what you mean?

I know how to do the base step, but the induction step is challenging
 
I think your difficulty is not with this problem in particular, but with applying induction in general. Therefore, ideally you should get a description of proof by induction and ask questions about that, possibly using the example you gave. For example, "I am not sure how to state the induction hypothesis in this problem. Is the following correct?"

For an outline of induction proof, see https://driven2services.com/staging/mh/index.php?posts/45490/.
 
delc1 said:
Still not quite sure what you mean?

I know how to do the base step, but the induction step is challenging

For the inductive step, I would let:

$$f(n)=n\left(n^2+5\right)$$

And then consider adding:

$$f(n+1)-f(n)$$

to both sides. Add this as is to the left side of your hypothesis, and add the simplified form to the right, and you should find your proof is complete.
 
I'd like to make it clear to you what you have to do, in order to prove this by induction.

First, we ASSUME it is true for $n$, that is we assume:

$n^2(n+5) = 3k$, for some integer $k$ (we don't have to really know which one).

Let's re-write this in a form that will be more easy to "spot" later on:

$n^3 + 5n = 3k$.

We need to USE this somehow, to prove that under these circumstances for $n+1$:

$(n+1)^2((n+1) + 5) = 3k'$ (again, all we need to do is show $k'$ exists, we do not need to find it specifically).

Let's re-write this in a form that will be more helpful to us:

$(n+1)^3 + 5(n+1) = 3k'$ <---this is what we want to prove.

I suggest multiplying out the left-hand side, and see if you "recognize" some part of it (like maybe the part we use in our assumption (induction hypothesis)). What can you say about what's "left over"?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
734
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K