MHB Solving Minute Hand Distance from Ground Graph Problem

jshayhsei
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'd like to know how to solve this. I'm pretty lost as to how to solve this. I want to say that the graph would look periodic because of the graph of the time would go down and then go back up again, but I really don't have anything concrete.

The question states:

The circular clock has a diameter of 14 inches and its minute had has length 6 inches. It is placed on the wall so that the center of the clock is 66 inches above the ground. Which of the following graphs could represent the distance from the tip of the arrow of the minute hand to the ground with respect to time from 10 a.m. to 11 a.m.?

View attachment 8815
 

Attachments

  • graphs.jpg
    graphs.jpg
    55.7 KB · Views: 141
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi, and welcome to the forum.

Can you figure out the initial position (height above the ground) of the minute hand tip at 10 a.m.? Also, do you know what cosine is and what its graph looks like?
 
(A) isn't possible because the minute had will have returned to its original height after 60 minutes.
(C) isn't possible because it has straight lines while the minute hand in moving in a circle.
That leaves (B) and (D) and the most obvious difference between the is that (B) is "smooth" while (D) has a cusp at the bottom. (D) implies a sudden change in direction which cannot be the case in circular motion.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top