Solving Momentum & Energy Homework: Glider Collision

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving a physics problem involving an elastic collision between two air track gliders with masses of 0.30 kg and 0.20 kg, moving at speeds of 0.50 m/s and 1.0 m/s, respectively. The correct final velocities after the collision are determined to be -0.70 m/s and 0.80 m/s. Participants emphasize the importance of using both the conservation of momentum and the conservation of kinetic energy equations to solve for the final velocities. The key equations discussed include m1v1 + m2v2 = m1V1f + m2V2f and Ek1 + Ek2 = Ek1' + Ek2'.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of elastic collisions in physics
  • Familiarity with the conservation of momentum principle
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy calculations
  • Ability to solve simultaneous equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Practice solving problems involving conservation of momentum and energy
  • Learn how to derive final velocities from collision equations
  • Explore real-world applications of collision physics in sports or vehicle dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone preparing for exams involving collision problems.

twenty5
Messages
93
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two air track gliders of mass 0.30kg and 0.20 kg are moving towards each other with speeds of 0.50 m/s and 1.0m/s respectively. Take the direction of the more massive glider as positive.

A) if the collision is elastic, find the velocity of each glider after the collision.

Answer is: [ -0.70m/s , 0.80m/s ]

Homework Equations


m1v1 + m2v2 = (m1 + m2 ) v'

Ek = 1/2 mv2

for.. elastic equations i think..
Ek = Ek'

The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried using the v1' and v2' equations and subbing in the values, but the answer was not correct O_O. Uhm.. I just need a little hand on where to go next! (Note: I've also tried drawing the diagrams and I think they are correct xP) okay I've got one of the answers.. -0.7m/s but with that 1 equation.. how do I get the other answer lol...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your first two equations are not correct. How did you get those equations? Remember that in an eleastic collision, both momentum and energy are conserved.
 
Mattowander said:
Your first two equations are not correct. How did you get those equations? Remember that in an eleastic collision, both momentum and energy are conserved.

1 quick question, how do I know if the system is a conserved momentum or... not? if it is conserved momentum.. I believe I would use 1/2 Mv^2 + 1/2 mv^2 = 1/2 mv'^2 + 1/2 mv'^2

(didn't put the little signs =P)
 
As I understand it, in nearly all collisions, momentum is conserved. In inelastic collisions, energy is not conserved.
 
Mattowander said:
As I understand it, in nearly all collisions, momentum is conserved. In inelastic collisions, energy is not conserved.

mmm k that helped ^^

ok just want to double check here...

so basically.. for all or most questions that involve a collision other then inelastic, it's associated with the formula...

m1v1 + m2v2 = (m1 + m2 ) v'

EDIT: okay I just used that, and only got the final velocity of 1 of the objects lol...
errr.. still trying x.x
think i just got it ..
 
Last edited:
blaghh nvm I didn't get the second final velocity..
 
No. That equation would be used for what are called perfectly inelastic collisions. In this situation, energy is NOT conserved, and the objects stick together. That's why the right hand side of the equation has the (m1+m2) term.

However, in this problem we are dealing with elastic collisions and so we would use this equation to represent the conservation of momentum.

m1v1 + m2v2 = m1V1f + m2V2f where the f subscript represents the velocity of the mass after the collision. Hopefully that helps!
 
Mattowander said:
No. That equation would be used for what are called perfectly inelastic collisions. In this situation, energy is NOT conserved, and the objects stick together. That's why the right hand side of the equation has the (m1+m2) term.

However, in this problem we are dealing with elastic collisions and so we would use this equation to represent the conservation of momentum.

m1v1 + m2v2 = m1V1f + m2V2f where the f subscript represents the velocity of the mass after the collision. Hopefully that helps!

hm.. I think that cleans up some bit of stuff rofl thanks.. if I run into any trouble I'll post back in about 3 - 5 minutes
 
Last edited:
If I use that equation.. wouldn't I have 2 unknown variables? V1f and V2f?

ok well, I used that equation and I ended up with

0.35 = 0.3v1' + 0.2v2'
 
  • #10
You would. However, you can also use the fact that kinetic energy is conserved to formulate a second equation. With two equations and two unknown variables, you should be able to solve.

Remember, K.E. = 1/2mv^2
 
  • #11
uhmm I used the 1/2 mv12 + 1/2mv22 = 1/2 mv12 + 1/2 mv22

... Ek1 + Ek2 = Ek1' + Ek2'...?

and I ended up with a weird number for V12'
 
  • #12
What number did you end up with?

You need to use a combination of the conservation of energy equation and conservation of momentum equation. You have two unknown variables. You can solve for one of these unknown's in terms of the other unknown variable, and then plug that into the second equation
 
  • #13
Mattowander said:
What number did you end up with?

You need to use a combination of the conservation of energy equation and conservation of momentum equation. You have two unknown variables. You can solve for one of these unknown's in terms of the other unknown variable, and then plug that into the second equation

is the formula I typed right above your post correct?
 
  • #14
ok well I got Square Root of ( ( 0.1375 - 0.1v22')/ 0.15) = V1'
 
  • #15
twenty5 said:
uhmm I used the 1/2 mv12 + 1/2mv22 = 1/2 mv12 + 1/2 mv22

... Ek1 + Ek2 = Ek1' + Ek2'...?

and I ended up with a weird number for V12'



The first equation is wrong ( or you forgot your subscripts ). You forgot to label the masses m1 and m2, and in your equation the velocities are the same on both sides. A more precise equation would be

1/2m1v1^2 + 1/2m2v2^2 = 1/2m1v1f^2 + 1/2m2v2f^2.

I know it's kind of confusing, especially typed out. Hopefully it makes sense to you!
 
  • #16
BUUMP still need help =/ I gots a test tomorrow
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K