Solving non-homogeneous system of ODE using matrix exponential

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 731016
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ode
member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this problem,
1715737007574.png

I don't understand why they include the constants of integration ##c_1 and c_2##, since the formula that we are meant to be using is ##\vec x = e^{At}c + e^{At}\int_{t_0}^{t} e^{-As} F(s)~ds## so we already have the integration variables. Does anybody please know why?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ChiralSuperfields said:
Homework Statement: Please see below
Relevant Equations: Please see below

For this problem,
View attachment 345266
I don't understand why they include the constants of integration ##c_1 and c_2##, since the formula that we are meant to be using is ##\vec x = e^{At}c + e^{At}\int_{t_0}^{t} e^{-As} F(s)~ds## so we already have the integration variables. Does anybody please know why?

Thanks!
Sorry I made a mistake, the equation I'm using is ##\vec x = e^{At}\vec x(0)+ e^{At}\int_{0}^{t} e^{-As} f(s)~ds##
 
They are evidently using e^{At}\int^t e^{-As}f(s)\,ds with an indefinite integral, so that an arbitrary constant of integration must be included. If instead the integral is made definite with a lower limit of t_0, then the arbitrary constant becomes \vec{x}(t_0).
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016
Thank you for your reply @pasmith! Sorry do you mean ##\vec x = e^{At}\vec x(0) + \int e^{At}f(t)~dt## as the indefinite integral?

Thanks!
 
No. The indefinite integral already includes an arbitrary constant; you don't need to add an e^{At}x(0) term in this case. That leaves e^{At} \int e^{-At}f(t)\,dt.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Love
Likes member 731016
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top