Solving Non-Linear Recurrence Relation?

Click For Summary
To solve non-linear recurrence relations, one approach is to transform them into homogeneous linear recurrence relations. For the sequence given, F_{n+1} = F_{n} + n^{2}, the transformation involves using an operator R that shifts the sequence, allowing the equation to be expressed in a linear form. This method leads to a fourth-order linear equation, which can be solved using standard techniques. The solutions will depend on four arbitrary constants, three of which can be eliminated through substitution. Understanding these transformations is crucial for effectively solving non-linear recurrence relations.
FeDeX_LaTeX
Science Advisor
Messages
436
Reaction score
13
Hello;

I do not have any experience in solving non-linear recurrence relations, so I was just wondering how one solves them.

For example, consider the sequence: 1, 2, 6, 15, 31, 56

In general, F_{n+1} = F_{n} + n^{2}

Do I still substitute F_{n} = k^{n}?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
First transform into a homogeneous linear recurrence relation. In your case, a(n) = 4a(n-1) - 6a(n-2) + 4a(n-3) - a(n-4).
 
Hello;

Thanks for the reply. How did you transform it into a homogeneous linear recurrence relation? Did you use trial and error, or is there a method to do this (or is there something obvious I'm missing here)? Can all non-linear recurrence relations be transformed into homogeneous linear recurrence relations?
 
FeDeX_LaTeX said:
Hello;

I do not have any experience in solving non-linear recurrence relations, so I was just wondering how one solves them.

For example, consider the sequence: 1, 2, 6, 15, 31, 56

In general, F_{n+1} = F_{n} + n^{2}

Do I still substitute F_{n} = k^{n}?

Thanks.

Introduce the operator R that retards sequences:

R(f_n)=f_{n-1}

then you can express you equation as

(R-1)f_n=(n-1)^2

Multiply this by (R-1)^3 from the left, you'll get

(R-1)^4f_n=0

(check it...)

This last equation is linear and is of fourth order, the solutions depends on 4 arbitrary constants. 3 of then can be eliminated by substitution into the original equation.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K