Actually, I think it shouldn't be what you have. The radius of that circle should be [itex]\sqrt{\beta^2-c}[/itex], not [itex]\sqrt{\beta^2+ c}[/itex] as you have.
Since these circles are orthogonal to all of the circles in the original family, they are, in particular, orthogonal to the circle with g= 0, [itex]x^2+ y^2+ c= 0[/itex] which is a circle with center at the origin and radius [itex]\sqrt{-c}[/itex] (of course, c must be negative). Let the radius of that circle be r and the radius of the circle orthogonal to it be R. The line from [itex](0, \beta)[/itex] to a point, (x, y) on that circle, being a radius of the orthogonal circle has length R and is perpendicular to the radius of that circle, the line from (0, 0) to (x, y), which has length r. They form a right triangle with hypotenuse the line from (0, 0) to [itex](0, \beta)[/itex] which has length [itex]\beta[/itex].
By the Pythagorean theorem, [itex]R^2+ r^2= \beta^2[/itex] so that [itex]R^2= \beta^2- r^2[/itex]. The original circle, as I said, has length [itex]\sqrt{-c}[/itex] and so [itex]r^2= -c[/itex]. We have [itex]R^2= \beta^2+ c[/itex], not [itex]R^2= \beta^2+ c[/itex].
Of course, the whole problem would make more sense (c would not have to be negative) if the equation were [itex]x^2+ y^2+ 2gx- c= 0[/itex] or [itex]x^2+ y^2+ 2gx= c[/itex] rather than [itex]x^2+ y^2+ 2gx+ c= 0[/itex]. In that cases [itex]R^2= \beta^2- c[/itex] would be correct.