Solving Overexposed Photos from Kodak P&S Camera

  • Thread starter Thread starter z-component
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pictures
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on correcting overexposed photos taken with a Kodak Point & Shoot 4.0 megapixel camera, specifically the Kodak EasyShare LS743. Users shared experiences and techniques for adjusting brightness and contrast in Photoshop 6 to mitigate overexposure issues. Suggestions included utilizing the camera's exposure compensation settings, which range from +2 to -2 in increments of 0.5, and employing a UV filter to enhance outdoor shots. The consensus is that while some overexposure can be corrected, achieving ideal exposure often requires careful manual adjustments.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of exposure compensation settings in cameras
  • Familiarity with Photoshop 6 for photo editing
  • Knowledge of UV filters and their impact on photography
  • Basic principles of brightness and contrast adjustments
NEXT STEPS
  • Research techniques for using exposure compensation in photography
  • Learn advanced photo editing techniques in Photoshop 6
  • Explore the benefits of using UV filters for outdoor photography
  • Investigate manual exposure settings and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Amateur photographers, photo editors, and anyone using Kodak Point & Shoot cameras who seeks to improve their skills in correcting exposure issues in photography.

z-component
Messages
494
Reaction score
2
I went around campus last week to take some pictures, and I remember the sun was really bright that day. When I saw them at full size I noticed most of them were overexposed. When I took some from in shadows, I expected the white balance of the surroundings to be off because of the light difference, but even ones taken in equal lighting were this way. Here are some examples:

Overexposed in shadow:
http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/5033/1004589ml4.jpg

Overexposed in equal light:
http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/9594/1004590ko0.jpg

Ideal exposure:
http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/3773/1004615tg7.jpg

I use a Kodak Point & Shoot 4.0 megapixel camera, which I know isn't supposed to give me the best shots; however, I'm wondering if anyone knows any tips or special ways of editing that can correct this type of problem.

(Sorry that the pictures are large-- you can save them for viewing and have them appear at screen size in Windows Picture Viewer.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, I think that the last one looks great just the way it is.
I've found that overexposure is very difficult to correct, even in Photoshop 6. Conversely, I've had some that were so dark you couldn't see anything, and they came out almost perfect.
Anyhow, just go into your 'brightness' and 'contrast' settings in PS and start tweaking. Always make sure to save the changes under a different file name so you can return to the original if you don't like the results.
 
Does your camera have an AE lock? They can be helpful in these setings
 
The first one looks ok to me if you're just looking at the tree. The second one has the building exposed properly, which makes the sidewalk overexposed. Unless you have manual exposure settings (a +/- setting) or more advanced manual controls, that can be tough to correct.

For the first one, I'm not sure if you are close enough to the tree for it, but using a flash outside during the day can eliminate shadows and drop the exposure, reducing the overexposure in the background.
 
z-component said:
I use a Kodak Point & Shoot 4.0 megapixel camera
Model number/name?

pic#3 is very good.
 
russ_watters said:
For the first one, I'm not sure if you are close enough to the tree for it, but using a flash outside during the day can eliminate shadows and drop the exposure, reducing the overexposure in the background.
Nice idea - might just work.
 
Thanks everyone.

Danger said:
Actually, I think that the last one looks great just the way it is.
Gokul43201 said:
pic#3 is very good.
Thanks to the both of you. I really like how this one turned out and that's the balance of exposure that I want in all of my pictures. It's the other two that disappointed me.
russ_watters said:
Unless you have manual exposure settings (a +/- setting) or more advanced manual controls, that can be tough to correct.
I have control over exposure compensation, that ranges from +2 to -2 that goes in increments of .5. I'm going to check the manual about that setting, and I guess it's a good idea to go out and experiment with it on objects.
Gokul43201 said:
Model number/name?
It's a Kodak EasyShare LS743
 
z-component said:
I went around campus last week to take some pictures

Ah, memories. :approve:
 
From playing around years ago I would say the building shot needed a UV filter. Cameras don't "see" the same spectral range that you do and UV is often a problem in outdoor shots.

The filter might have helped with the tree as well, but this kind of shot is difficult at best. Always a trade off between subject too dark and background to bright.
An extreme example would be a silhouette.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
11K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K