Solving Overexposed Photos from Kodak P&S Camera

  • Thread starter Thread starter z-component
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pictures
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the issue of overexposed photographs taken with a Kodak Point & Shoot camera. Participants explore potential causes of overexposure, editing techniques, and camera settings that might help mitigate the problem. The scope includes practical photography tips, editing advice, and technical considerations related to exposure settings.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that overexposure is difficult to correct, even with editing software like Photoshop, while others suggest adjusting brightness and contrast settings.
  • Another participant inquires about the camera's AE lock feature, suggesting it could be beneficial in bright conditions.
  • Some participants discuss specific images, pointing out that while one image looks fine, others have issues with overexposure in certain areas, such as sidewalks or backgrounds.
  • There is mention of using a flash outdoors to reduce shadows and overexposure, with some participants agreeing that this could be a useful technique.
  • A participant shares their camera model and expresses a desire to achieve better exposure balance in future photos, mentioning their control over exposure compensation settings.
  • One participant suggests that a UV filter might have helped with the overexposure issues, noting the challenges of capturing outdoor shots with varying light conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of opinions regarding the quality of the images, with some finding certain photos acceptable while others highlight issues with overexposure. There is no clear consensus on the best methods to correct the overexposure problem, as various techniques and camera settings are proposed.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention limitations related to the camera's capabilities, such as the lack of advanced manual controls and the challenges of achieving proper exposure in bright outdoor settings. There are also references to specific editing software and techniques that may not yield consistent results.

z-component
Messages
494
Reaction score
2
I went around campus last week to take some pictures, and I remember the sun was really bright that day. When I saw them at full size I noticed most of them were overexposed. When I took some from in shadows, I expected the white balance of the surroundings to be off because of the light difference, but even ones taken in equal lighting were this way. Here are some examples:

Overexposed in shadow:
http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/5033/1004589ml4.jpg

Overexposed in equal light:
http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/9594/1004590ko0.jpg

Ideal exposure:
http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/3773/1004615tg7.jpg

I use a Kodak Point & Shoot 4.0 megapixel camera, which I know isn't supposed to give me the best shots; however, I'm wondering if anyone knows any tips or special ways of editing that can correct this type of problem.

(Sorry that the pictures are large-- you can save them for viewing and have them appear at screen size in Windows Picture Viewer.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, I think that the last one looks great just the way it is.
I've found that overexposure is very difficult to correct, even in Photoshop 6. Conversely, I've had some that were so dark you couldn't see anything, and they came out almost perfect.
Anyhow, just go into your 'brightness' and 'contrast' settings in PS and start tweaking. Always make sure to save the changes under a different file name so you can return to the original if you don't like the results.
 
Does your camera have an AE lock? They can be helpful in these setings
 
The first one looks ok to me if you're just looking at the tree. The second one has the building exposed properly, which makes the sidewalk overexposed. Unless you have manual exposure settings (a +/- setting) or more advanced manual controls, that can be tough to correct.

For the first one, I'm not sure if you are close enough to the tree for it, but using a flash outside during the day can eliminate shadows and drop the exposure, reducing the overexposure in the background.
 
z-component said:
I use a Kodak Point & Shoot 4.0 megapixel camera
Model number/name?

pic#3 is very good.
 
russ_watters said:
For the first one, I'm not sure if you are close enough to the tree for it, but using a flash outside during the day can eliminate shadows and drop the exposure, reducing the overexposure in the background.
Nice idea - might just work.
 
Thanks everyone.

Danger said:
Actually, I think that the last one looks great just the way it is.
Gokul43201 said:
pic#3 is very good.
Thanks to the both of you. I really like how this one turned out and that's the balance of exposure that I want in all of my pictures. It's the other two that disappointed me.
russ_watters said:
Unless you have manual exposure settings (a +/- setting) or more advanced manual controls, that can be tough to correct.
I have control over exposure compensation, that ranges from +2 to -2 that goes in increments of .5. I'm going to check the manual about that setting, and I guess it's a good idea to go out and experiment with it on objects.
Gokul43201 said:
Model number/name?
It's a Kodak EasyShare LS743
 
z-component said:
I went around campus last week to take some pictures

Ah, memories. :approve:
 
From playing around years ago I would say the building shot needed a UV filter. Cameras don't "see" the same spectral range that you do and UV is often a problem in outdoor shots.

The filter might have helped with the tree as well, but this kind of shot is difficult at best. Always a trade off between subject too dark and background to bright.
An extreme example would be a silhouette.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
11K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K