Solving Particle Production Homework | Mass of C* & Gamma Energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter JSGandora
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a particle collision scenario involving particle A at rest and particle B accelerated towards it, resulting in the production of an unknown particle C*. The problem involves concepts from particle physics and conservation laws, specifically energy and momentum conservation, as well as the implications of particle decay and gamma radiation emission.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the conservation of energy and momentum to find the mass of particle C*. They question the implications of particle C* decaying into a state of zero kinetic energy and discuss the energy recorded by the detector. Some participants suggest using different reference frames for calculations, while others raise concerns about the validity of their equations and the need for directional momentum in their analyses.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing various approaches to the problem. Some have offered insights into the conservation laws and the implications of the decay process, while others are seeking clarification on their calculations and the correct interpretation of the reference frames involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of relativistic physics, including the effects of reference frames and the assumptions regarding kinetic energy during particle decay. There is an acknowledgment of potential computational errors and the need for careful consideration of momentum directions.

JSGandora
Messages
92
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Particle A (mass 1000 MeV/c^2) is at rest at the center of a spherical gamma detector, which completely surrounds it except for a small hole. We accelerate particle B (mass 500 MeV/c^2) to a total energy of 700 MeV, sending it through the hole towards particle A. When the particles collide, a single, excited particle of unknown mass, C*, is produced. C* quickly decays to its unexcited state, C (mass 1300 MeV/c^2), emitting a single gamma ray.

a) Find the mass of C*.
b) If the gamma is emitted directly away from the hole, what energy does the detector record?
c) The experiment is repeated, and the detector records an energy of 300 MeV. At what angles did particle C and the gamma emerge? Assume that C* decays at the center of the detector. Let an angle of 0 be directly away from the hole, and an angle of \pi be directly towards the hole.

Homework Equations


E^2 = p^2 c^2 + m^2 c^4

The Attempt at a Solution


a) We have the total energy of the system to be 1000 MeV/c^2+700 MeV/c^2 = 1700 MeV/c^2. We also have the total momentum of the system to be only from particle B which is

p=\sqrt{ E_B^2/c^2 -m_B^2 c^2}=\sqrt{(700 MeV)^2/c^2 - (500 MeV)^2 / c^2} = 490 MeV/c

Then by conservation of energy and momentum, the calculated momentum and energies do not change so the new particle C* has a mass of

m^2=\sqrt{E^2/c^4-p^2 / c^2} =\sqrt{(1700MeV/c^2)^2 - (490 MeV/c^2)^2} = \boxed{1628 MeV/c^2}

Can someone tell me if this is right or not?

b) It is given that the C* particle decays into its unexcited state C. Does that mean it decays into a state of 0 kinetic energy? So the gamma particle carries away an energy that is the difference of the total energy (1700 MeV) and the rest energy of C (given as 1300 MeV). So would the energy detector detect an energy of 1700 MeV - 1300 MeV = \boxed{400 MeV}. But that would violate conservation of momentum which would require the sum of the momentum of the gamma ray E_{\gamma}/c = 400 MeV/c and the momentum of the C particle p_C=\sqrt{ E_C^2/c^2 -m_C^2 c^2} = 0 (no velocity) to be equal to the momentum calculated before which was 490 MeV/c which is not true. However, if we solve the equations
E_{\gamma}/c +\sqrt{ E_C^2/c^2 -m_C^2 c^2}=490 MeV/c
and
E_{\gamma} + E_C = 1700 MeV
we get E_C = 1303 MeV and E_\gamma = 397 MeV. So is the answer 397 MeV?

I also have no idea how to solve part d. Can someone help me? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can someone tell me if this is right or not?
The formulas are right, checking numbers is something for a computer.

b) It is given that the C* particle decays into its unexcited state C. Does that mean it decays into a state of 0 kinetic energy?
In which frame? (=no)

The second approach looks good.

For part (c), your momenta need directions.
 
If you change to the rest frame of C*, then only E^2-p^2c^2=m^2 c^4 is conserved which is, 1628 MeV. Then if it decays to its unexcited state, we can apply conservation of energy (energy stays at 1628 MeV) and conservation of momentum (which stays at 0) to get

E_\gamma + E_C = 1628 MeV​
Momentum of Gamma ray: \frac{E_\gamma}{c}
Momentum of C particle: \frac{\sqrt{E_C^2-m^2c^4}}{c} where m=1300 MeV/c^2.

And they must have velocities in the opposite direction in order to have a total momentum 0 so we have

\frac{E_\gamma}{c}=\frac{\sqrt{E_C^2-(1300 MeV)^2}}{c}​

The system has no real solutions according to wolfram alpha. I double checked my calculations from the first part and I don't think I have anything incorrect. Are my equations incorrect?
 
Oh strange, I must have inputted it incorrectly. Then E_C = 1333 MeV. How do I convert that back to the initial reference frame?
 
You'll need the motion of the rest frame of C*, and some variable for the angle, and then a Lorentz transformation. I would use Eγ, however, as you know the photon energy in the lab frame.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
11K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K