Solving polynomial equation using induction

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the polynomial equation f(x) = (x+1)p(x) where f(x) = x^{2n} + 2nx + 2n - 1. The solution provided identifies p(x) as x^{2n-1} - x^{2n-2} + ... - x^2 + x + 2n - 1. Participants explore methods such as polynomial long division and coefficient comparison to derive p(x), emphasizing the effectiveness of equating coefficients in polynomial identities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with polynomial long division
  • Knowledge of the method of mathematical induction
  • Ability to equate coefficients in polynomial equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study polynomial long division techniques in depth
  • Learn about mathematical induction and its applications in polynomial proofs
  • Explore advanced polynomial identities and their derivations
  • Practice problems involving coefficient comparison in polynomial equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on algebra and polynomial equations, as well as anyone interested in enhancing their problem-solving skills in mathematical proofs.

thereddevils
Messages
436
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If f(x)=(x+1)p(x) where f(x)=x^{2n}+2nx+2n-1, what is p(x)?

Answer given: [tex]x^{2n-1}-x^{2n-2}+...-x^2+x+2n-1[/tex]

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I tried the long division and managed to some terms correct. Is there any other methods of finding this? Perhaps induction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I barely ever use long division, because it is easy to find ways around it which I prefer. I can't see why it wouldn't work though.

[tex]x^{2n}+2nx+2n-1=(x-1)p(x)[/tex]

So how about we equate coefficients?

Say, if we were given that [tex]x^3-x^2+x-1=(x-1)f(x)[/tex] then we could let [tex]f(x)=a_1x^2+a_2x+a_3[/tex] where [tex]a_n[/tex] is just some constant, then we would expand the right hand side as such, [tex]a_1x^3+a_2x^2+a_3x-a_1x^2-a_2x-a_3=a_1x^3+(a_2-a_1)x^2+(a_3-a_2)x-a_3[/tex]

So now we can equate coefficients, since [tex]x^3-x^2+x-1=a_1x^3+(a_2-a_1)x^2+(a_3-a_2)x-a_3[/tex]

Then obviously,

[tex]a_1=1[/tex]
[tex]a_2-a_1=-1[/tex]
[tex]a_3-a_2=1[/tex]
[tex]-a_3=-1[/tex]

Now just do the same for your problem. You can of course skip obvious steps by quickly realizing that the coefficient of the x3 term is 1, so the other factor [tex]a_1=1[/tex] and also the constant is equal to 1, so [tex]a_3=-1[/tex].
 


Mentallic said:
I barely ever use long division, because it is easy to find ways around it which I prefer. I can't see why it wouldn't work though.

[tex]x^{2n}+2nx+2n-1=(x-1)p(x)[/tex]

So how about we equate coefficients?

Say, if we were given that [tex]x^3-x^2+x-1=(x-1)f(x)[/tex] then we could let [tex]f(x)=a_1x^2+a_2x+a_3[/tex] where [tex]a_n[/tex] is just some constant, then we would expand the right hand side as such, [tex]a_1x^3+a_2x^2+a_3x-a_1x^2-a_2x-a_3=a_1x^3+(a_2-a_1)x^2+(a_3-a_2)x-a_3[/tex]

So now we can equate coefficients, since [tex]x^3-x^2+x-1=a_1x^3+(a_2-a_1)x^2+(a_3-a_2)x-a_3[/tex]

Then obviously,

[tex]a_1=1[/tex]
[tex]a_2-a_1=-1[/tex]
[tex]a_3-a_2=1[/tex]
[tex]-a_3=-1[/tex]

Now just do the same for your problem. You can of course skip obvious steps by quickly realizing that the coefficient of the x3 term is 1, so the other factor [tex]a_1=1[/tex] and also the constant is equal to 1, so [tex]a_3=-1[/tex].

Thank you. I should have thought of this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K