Solving Potential V with Schrodinger Equation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the Schrödinger equation for a specific potential profile, which includes regions of infinite potential, negative potential, and zero potential. Participants explore the implications of the potential on the energy states of a particle, particularly focusing on bound states and the nature of wavefunctions in different regions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that for bound states, the energy must be less than the potential, leading to the condition |E| > V_0 when V is negative.
  • Others argue that the general solution provided is not correct, suggesting that the wavefunction must be derived for each region without skipping steps.
  • A participant questions the requirement for a bound state, asking whether it is defined by E < V or |E| < |V|, particularly in the context of negative potentials.
  • There is a contention regarding the nature of k in different regions, with some asserting that k can be imaginary in the well, leading to oscillatory solutions, while others maintain that k is real in the decaying regions.
  • One participant explains that the requirement for a bound state is |E| < |V| and suggests that the situation can be understood by shifting the potential up by V_0.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the wavefunctions in various regions and the conditions for bound states. There is no consensus on the correct interpretation of the potential and its implications for the energy states.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of carefully writing out the time-independent Schrödinger equation for each region and emphasize the need to consider the implications of negative potentials on bound states.

KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4
Assume the potential in question is

[tex] V = \left\{<br /> \begin{matrix}<br /> \infty, \qquad x<0 \\<br /> -V_0, \qquad 0\leq x \leq a \\<br /> 0, \qquad x>a<br /> \end{matrix}<br /> \right.[/tex]

where [tex]V_0[/tex] is positive.

if we need to find the bound state, we consider the energy is less than the potential. But the potential withn [0, a] is negative, is that mean the energy will be more negative (i.e. [tex]|E| > V_0[/tex]) ?

Generally, the Schrödinger equation will be written of the following form

[tex] \frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2} + k^2\psi = 0[/tex]

where

[tex]k = \sqrt{\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}(E-V)}[/tex]. The general solution is of the form

[tex]\psi = A\exp(ikx) + B\exp(-ikx)[/tex]

For x<0 or x>a region, the wavefunction must decay because the potential is larger than E, [tex]k=\sqrt{\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}(E-V)} = i \sqrt{\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}(V-E)} = i\kappa[/tex], the solutions in those region become

[tex]\psi = A\exp(\kappa x) + B\exp(-\kappa x)[/tex]

But within [0, a], if we want to find bound state, energy must be negative and [tex]|E|>V_0[/tex], so

[tex]k = \sqrt{\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}(-|E|-(-V_0))} = \sqrt{\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}(V_0-|E|)}[/tex]

but this also lead to k be imaginary number, that is, the solution within [0, a] is decaying again? But I think the solution in that region should be oscillating. Where am I get wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
first of all your "general solution" isn't a general solution. it's the solution in the well and you produce the correct solution for x>a by luck.

energy should be less than zero but greater than -v_0.

for x<0 the wavefunction doesn't exist. write out the entire time independent shrodinger eqn like this:

[tex]\frac{-h^2}{2m}\frac{d^2 \psi(x)}{dx^2}+V(x) \psi (x) = E \psi(x)[/tex]

for each region and don't skip steps and you should end up with

[tex]k=\pm\sqrt{\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}(-E+V_0)}=\pm\sqrt{-\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}(V_0 - E)}[/tex]

inside the halfwell which produces standing waves in the well. note E is negative by assumption.
 
Thanks for reply.

ice109 said:
first of all your "general solution" isn't a general solution. it's the solution in the well and you produce the correct solution for x>a by luck.
I don't understand why not. In that solution form, k is varied from region to region. In rightmost region, k is imaginary which decaying solution. So why can I say in all regions they have same form of solution but with different k?

energy should be less than zero but greater than -v_0.
This is my doubt. I wonder what's the requirement of bound state? Is E<V or |E|<|V| ?
If the potential V is positive, it will trap the particle has energy less than the potential, it is quite trivial. But how to understanding the situation when the potential is negative?

for x<0 the wavefunction doesn't exist. write out the entire time independent shrodinger eqn like this:

[tex]\frac{d^2 \psi(x)}{dx^2}+V(x) \psi (x) = E \psi(x)[/tex]

for each region and don't skip steps and you should end up with

[tex]k=\pm\sqrt{-\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}(E+V_0)}[/tex]

inside the halfwell which produces standing waves in the well.
 
KFC said:
Thanks for reply.


I don't understand why not. In that solution form, k is varied from region to region. In rightmost region, k is imaginary which decaying solution. So why can I say in all regions they have same form of solution but with different k?
but you have it wrong. in right most region k is real and therefore the solution decays, and in the well k is imaginary and hence oscillates. have you taken a differential equations class?
KFC said:
This is my doubt. I wonder what's the requirement of bound state? Is E<V or |E|<|V| ?
If the potential V is positive, it will trap the particle has energy less than the potential, it is quite trivial. But how to understanding the situation when the potential is negative?
the requirement for a bound state is |E|<|V|. you can understand the situation when the potential is negative by realizing that there's no such thing as absolute potentials, only relative potentials and therefore the whole situation is the same if we shift the potential up everywhere by [itex]V_0[/itex]. then for [itex]0<x<a ~~ V(x)=0[/itex], for [itex]x>a ~~ V(x) = V_0[/itex] and the for [itex]x<0 ~~ V(x) = \infty[/itex]
 
Thanks for explanation :)

ice109 said:
but you have it wrong. in right most region k is real and therefore the solution decays, and in the well k is imaginary and hence oscillates. have you taken a differential equations class?

the requirement for a bound state is |E|<|V|. you can understand the situation when the potential is negative by realizing that there's no such thing as absolute potentials, only relative potentials and therefore the whole situation is the same if we shift the potential up everywhere by [itex]V_0[/itex]. then for [itex]0<x<a ~~ V(x)=0[/itex], for [itex]x>a ~~ V(x) = V_0[/itex] and the for [itex]x<0 ~~ V(x) = \infty[/itex]
 
no prob. just out of curiosity what is your native language?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K