Solving Problem 4 of DJ Griffiths Electrodynamics Chapter 9

Zeeshan Ahmad
Gold Member
Messages
24
Reaction score
9
Thread moved from the technical forums, and the OP has been reminded to show their work.
Homework Statement
Obtain eq 20(show in the below picture)
Directly from the waves equation by separation of variable
Relevant Equations
linear combinations of sinusoidal waves
While I was doing a problems of chapter 9 of DJ griffith electrodynamics

I came across this problem 4
Problem statement
Obtain eq 20(show in the below picture)
Directly from the waves equation by separation of variable
IMG_20210916_113300.jpg

Could I have a straight solution in your word
Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, but some help to find the solution yourself. Roughly speaking you just need to do two steps (which are always the same for such linear partial differential equations!):

(a) write down the wave equation
(b) write down the separation ansatz, plug it into the wave equation and find the corresponding mode functions
 
  • Like
Likes vela and berkeman
Are you familiar with the method of separation of variables for solving PDEs? It's definitely something you should learn, if not.
 
I have posted it in the morning and done it up till when I got response to it
But thanks for the response 😊
From mr vanhees and vela
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top