Solving Reflection Coefficient for Step Potential: Why B ≠ 0?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the reflection coefficient in quantum mechanics, specifically in the context of a step potential where the potential is zero for x < 0 and V_not for x > 0. The original poster expresses confusion regarding why one of the coefficients, B, does not equal zero when considering the case where the energy E is less than the potential V_not.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the behavior of the coefficients in the wave function solutions for a step potential, questioning why B does not equal zero as x approaches negative infinity. They also raise a related question about the coefficient D when E is greater than V_not.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the implications of boundary conditions and the physical interpretations of the coefficients in the wave function. Some guidance has been provided regarding the nature of the wave functions and the conditions under which certain coefficients may be zero.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes considerations of tunneling effects and the specific physical scenarios represented by the coefficients in the wave function solutions. There is an acknowledgment of different physical situations that could arise depending on the values of the coefficients.

Thyestean
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm working through a step potential and I am confused as to why one of the coefficients doesn't go to zero.

V(x) = 0 when x < 0;
V(x) = V_not when x > 0;

a. Calculate reflection coefficient when E < V_not
I can solve the reflection part, it is a step towards it that i am confused about.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Now i know the solutions solve to:

Aexp(ikx)+Bexp(-ikx) where k= sqrt(2mE)/hbar when x<0
Cexp(lx) where l=sqrt(-2m(E-V_not)/hbar when x>0

So my question is why doesn't B=0? Because when x->-infinity it goes to infinity so B has to be 0. The only reason i can think it wouldn't is because of tunneling. If this is the case how do I spot this. Is it only relevant in step potentials?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
e-ikx is oscillatory. It doesn't blow up as x goes to -∞.
 
Ah thank you. Now that brings up another question for the same problem but now E>Vo.

The wave equations go to:
Aexp(ikx) + Bexp(-ikx) when x < 0. k=sqrt(2mE)/hbar
Cexp(ilx) + Dexp(-ilx) when x > 0. l=sqrt(2m(E-Vo))/hbar

Now in this case why does D=0.
 
It's a boundary condition essentially. The idea here is you have an incident wave coming from the left. That corresponds to the A term. When it hits the potential step, you get a reflection, the B term, and a transmitted wave, the C term. The D term would correspond to a wave traveling to the right from x=+∞. You could certainly solve a problem with D not equal to 0, but it would be a different physical situation than the one you're interested in.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K