Solving Relative Speed and Flashes in S' Frame

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving the relative speed and timing of light flashes in two reference frames, S and S'. The red light flashes at position xR = 3.00 m and time tR = 1e-9 s, while the blue light flashes at xB = 5.00 m and tB = 9e-9 s. The participants suggest using Lorentz transformations to find the relative speed between the frames and the timing of the flashes in frame S'. The discussion also touches on calculating fractional uncertainties in measurements, emphasizing the importance of proper application of formulas.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz transformations in special relativity
  • Familiarity with concepts of time dilation and length contraction
  • Knowledge of fractional uncertainties in measurements
  • Basic algebra and manipulation of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Lorentz transformations in detail to apply them effectively in problems
  • Learn about time dilation and length contraction in special relativity
  • Explore methods for calculating fractional uncertainties in physics
  • Practice solving problems involving multiple reference frames in relativity
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying special relativity and measurement uncertainties, will benefit from this discussion.

Oerg
Messages
350
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A red light flashes at position xR = 3:00m and time tR = 1e-9s, and
a blue light flashes at xB = 5:00m and tB = 9e-9 s, all measured in
the S reference frame. Reference frame S` has its origin at the same point
as S at t = t0 = 0; frame S' moves uniformly to the right. Both flashes
are observed to occur at the same place in S'. (a) Find the relative speed
between S and S`. (b) Find the location of the two flashes in frame S`.
(c) At what time does the red flash occur in the S' frame?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I am going crazy! This is my approach.

taking the distance of S' from x_R to be L_p measured in S and distance of S' from x_B to be contracted length L_C as measured in S',

L_p=L_c \times \gamma
x_A+2=x_A \times \gamma

at t_B distance traveled by S' frame is v X t'
taking t' to be t_B \times gamma,
x_A=3-vt'

But when i substituted x_A back into the equation, i became stuck! so obviously something is wrong but i cannot figure out what is wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't quite understand what you are doing. In any case, for a problem like this, why not use the Lorentz transformations directly. That's what they are for!
 
Doc AI, thanks for helping me again. I have another question though that is slightly unrelated to this.

Given that f=\frac{\bar u \bar v}{\bar u +\bar v}

show that

e_f=f^2({\frac{e_u}{\bar u^2} + \frac{e_v}{\bar v^2})

where e refers to the error. ok so I added up the fractional uncertainties and I got this

\frac{e_f}{f}=\frac{e_u}{u}+\frac{e_v}{v}+\frac{e_u+e_v}{u+v}

after some simplifying, I got to this,

e_f=f^2(\frac{e_u(u+v)}{u^2v}+\frac{e_v(u+v)}{v^2u}+\frac{e_u+e_v}{uv})

and then I realized that I could never get the answer, however, if this term was negative,
\frac{e_u+e_v}{uv}, i would get the answer perfectly, but how can it be negative? Problem is even in division, shouldn't the fractional uncertianties add up??
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K