Solving response surface for 0

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JT14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Response Surface
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around rearranging a response surface equation to find a polynomial that describes when the output variable P equals zero. Participants explore the implications of this equation in the context of modeling bacterial growth rates based on temperature and water levels, considering the challenges of representing boundaries between growth and non-growth.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a quadratic equation of the form P = A + B*X + C*X^2 + D*Y + E*Y^2 + F*X*Y and seeks to rearrange it to find when P = 0.
  • Another participant notes that the equation describes a conic section and suggests that it may not be possible to express it in the form y = f(x).
  • A participant mentions the context of bacterial growth rates and expresses difficulty in obtaining a boundary equation for growth versus no growth using response surfaces and binary logistic regressions.
  • One participant questions the necessity of the boundary being a function, suggesting that there could be regions bounded by curves that do not conform to the y = f(x) format.
  • There is a discussion about the potential for the curve defined by P(x,y) = 0 to be represented by different functions depending on the parameters, with an example of a conic section provided.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the boundary must be represented as a function and the feasibility of obtaining such a representation from the given equation. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to model the boundary between growth and non-growth.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the equation and the limitations of expressing the boundary as a single function, indicating that the nature of the conic section may depend on the specific values of the constants involved.

JT14
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I've done a response surface analysis, resulting in an equation of the form:

P= A + B*X + C*X^2 + D*Y + E*Y^2 + F*X*Y

Where A,B,C,D,E, and F are known values.

I want to rearrange the equation so I can get a polynomial describing when P=0, but I'm stuck.

Any suggestions?

Thanks,

Jono
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your equation is a quadratic form. You generally will not be able to solve it in the form y = f(x). Such an equation (with P = 0) describes a conic section (ellipses, hypberbolas, etc).

See this wikipedia page for details about how to identify which conic section your equation gives you.
 
I see... So I guess I need to re-think how I've done things.

I have a bunch of bacteria growth rates at different temperatures and water levels, and want to whack a curve on it that describes the boundary between growth and no growth for x (temp) and y(water). I've been playing around with response surfaces and binary logistic regressions, but I can't figure out how to get the resulting equations to give me an y=f(x) that describes the boundary.

Thanks for your help, it has been very useful.

J.
 
Why does the boundary have to be a function? Couldn't there be regions of growth and non-growth that are bounded by curves that can't be described by a form y = f(x)?

If you plot P(x,y) = 0 (e.g., using the contour-plot in Mathematica), what does the curve look like given your numbers A...E? Depending on your constants, it could be possible that the resulting curve could be described by a function for x > 0 and y > 0. For example, the curve

(x-2)^2 + y^2 = 4

is a conic section, and obviously a circle. You can't solve it exactly as y = f(x), although you can split it into two functions: [itex]y = \pm \sqrt{4-(x-2)^2}[/itex]. In this case, if you only care about x > 0, y > 0, you only need the [itex]y = + \sqrt{4-(x-2)^2}[/itex] solution.

Depending on your parameters, something similar could happen for your case, but in general it won't. However, again, I'm not sure why your boundary must be a function y = f(x)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K