Solving Row Echelon Form: Practicing Tips for Students

Click For Summary
Reducing a matrix to row echelon form can be challenging, especially for students who struggle with the mechanical steps involved. Practicing with simpler problems, such as two or three variable systems with integer solutions, can enhance understanding. It is crucial to master the linear combination method, as it directly relates to the mechanics of matrix reduction. Careful attention to arithmetic is essential, as many errors stem from calculation mistakes. Following a systematic approach, starting from the upper left and progressing down and to the right, helps maintain the integrity of previously established "1"s and "0"s.
Cpt Qwark
Messages
45
Reaction score
1
For some reason I just can't seem to wrap my head around the idea of reducing a Matrix to row echelon form. I'm familiar with the steps that the textbooks and tutorials use and how it's done but when I try practicing on my own I feel lost. e.g. all I end up with are just a bunch of random entries that don't bear any resemblance to row echelon form.
How would I practice better for this?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Perhaps try working a simple problem, say a two or three variable system with integer solutions, in tandem with the linear combination method? If you understand linear combination then you know the mechanics of how to reduce a matrix to ref. Often times mistakes come from the arithmetic; make sure you double check each calculation.
 
While it might be possible to simplify the calculations for special matrices, in general "row-reducing" is a very "mechanical" procedure.
Here is the idea with a 3 by 3 general matrix:
\begin{bmatrix}a & b & c \\ d & e & f \\ g & h & i\end{bmatrix}

I see that the "first column, first row" is "a" and I know I want "1" there so divide every number in the first column by a
\begin{bmatrix}1 & b/a & c/a \\ d & e & f \\ g & h & i\end{bmatrix}
Now, I see that the "first column, second row" and "first column third row" are "d" and "g" respectively and I want "0" there. So subtract the first row times d from the second row and subtract the first row times g from the third row. That gives
\begin{bmatrix}1 & b/a & c/a \\ 0 & e- bd/a & f- bd/a \\ 0 & h- bg/a & i- bg/a\end{bmatrix}

That completes the first column. Now look at the "second column, second row". It is "e- bd/a= (ae- bd)/a" and I want "1" there. So divide every number in the second row by (ae- bd/a)
\begin{bmatrix} 1 & b/a & c/a \\ 0 & 1 & \frac{af- bd}{ae- bd} \\ 0 & \frac{ah- bg}{a} & {ai- bg}{a}\end{bmatrix}
There is now \frac{ah- bg}{a} in the "second column, third row" and we want "0" there. So subtract \frac{ah- bg}{a} times the second row from the third row.
\begin{bmatrix} 1 & b/a & c/a \\ 0 & 1 & \frac{af- bd}{ae- bd} \\ 0 & 0 & {ai- bg}{a}- \frac{ai- bg}{a}\frac{ah- bg}{a}\end{bmatrix}

Start at the upper left and work down and to the right, doing one column at a time. That way, the "1"s and "0"s you already have won't be changed by further work.
 
  • Like
Likes Cpt Qwark
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K