Solving Second order non - homogeneous Differential Equation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the second-order non-homogeneous differential equation \( (x+1) y'' - (2x+5) y' + 2y = (x+1) e^x \). Participants explore various methods for finding both the general and particular solutions, including assumptions about the form of the solution.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests assuming a solution of the form \( y_1 = (Ax+B) e^x \) and then using \( y_2 = vy_1 \) to find the general solution.
  • Another participant questions whether including terms like \( x^2 \) or \( x^3 \) might be necessary in the assumed solution.
  • A detailed procedure is provided for finding the general solution of the associated homogeneous equation, leading to expressions for \( u(x) \) and \( v(x) \) as part of the solution process.
  • One participant notes that the computation for finding the particular solution is complex and suggests it be left as an exercise for others.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no clear consensus on the assumptions for the form of the solution, as one participant raises a question about the necessity of additional polynomial terms. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to take.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions and steps that may depend on specific definitions or interpretations of the differential equation. The complexity of the computations involved is acknowledged but not fully resolved.

ssh
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
How to solve \( (x+1) y'' - (2x+5) y' + 2y = (x+1) e^x\)

can we assume \(y_1 = (Ax+B) e^x \),
then \(y_2= vy_1​\) Is this right? then solve for A and B
Finally \( y = c_1 y_1 + c_2 y_2\)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure you don't want to include x^2 or x^3?
 
ssh said:
How to solve \( (x+1) y'' - (2x+5) y' + 2y = (x+1) e^x\)

can we assume \(y_1 = (Ax+B) e^x \),
then \(y_2= vy_1​\) Is this right? then solve for A and B
Finally \( y = c_1 y_1 + c_2 y_2\)

The solving procedure is the same used in...

http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f17/how-solve-differential-equation-second-order-linear-variable-coefficient-2089/

First You have to find the general solution of the incomplete equation...

$\displaystyle (x+1)\ y^{\ ''} - (2\ x + 5)\ y^{\ '} +2\ y=0$ (1)

... which has the form...

$\displaystyle y(x)= c_{1}\ u(x) + c_{2}\ v(x)$ (2)

If $u(x)$ and $v(x)$ are solutions of (1) then...

$\displaystyle (x+1)\ u^{\ ''} - (2\ x + 5)\ u^{\ '} +2\ u=0$

$\displaystyle (x+1)\ v^{\ ''} - (2\ x + 5)\ v^{\ '} +2\ v=0$ (3)

Multiplying the first of (3) by v and the second by u and do the difference we obtain...

$\displaystyle (x+1)\ (v\ u^{\ ''}-u\ v^{\ ''}) - (2\ x + 5)\ (v\ u^{\ '} -u\ v^{\ '})=0$ (4)

Now we set $\displaystyle z= v\ u^{\ '} -u\ v^{\ '}$ so that (4) becomes...

$\displaystyle z^{\ '}= \frac{2\ x+5}{x+1}$ (5)

The (5) is a first order ODE one solution of which is...

$\displaystyle z= 2\ x + 3\ \ln (x+1)$ (6)

... so that is...$\displaystyle \frac{d}{d x} (\frac{u}{v})= \frac{z}{v^{2}} = \frac{2\ x + 3\ \ln (x+1) + c_{2}}{v^{2}} \implies u= v\ \int \frac{2\ x + 3\ \ln (x+1) }{v^{2}}\ dx$ (7)

Now it is easy enough to see that $\displaystyle v= x+ \frac{5}{2}$ is solution of (1) so that from (7) we derive that...

$\displaystyle u= \ln (2\ x +5) + 2\ (x+1)\ \ln (x+1) + (2\ x+5)\ \ln (2\ x +5)$ (8)

... and the general solution of (1) is...

$\displaystyle y(x)= c_{1}\ (2\ x+5) + c_{2}\ \{(x+1)\ \ln (x+1) + (x+3)\ \ln (2\ x +5)\}$ (9)

... and the first part is completed. Now You have to search a particular solution of the complete equation... $\displaystyle (x+1)\ y^{\ ''} - (2\ x + 5)\ y^{\ '} +2\ y= (x+1)\ e^{x}$ (10)

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
The procedure described in post #12 of...http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f17/how-solve-differential-equation-second-order-linear-variable-coefficient-2089/index2.html

... may be used to find the particular solution Y(x) of the ODE proposed in this thread. The computation however is very unpleasant and the task is left as exercize to the readers (Tmi)...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K