MHB Solving Sequence Problem with Elementary Math Concepts

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on simplifying a sequence problem involving fractions for a 9-year-old. The sequence includes fractions that repeat in a structured manner, with each block having a constant sum of numerators and denominators. To find the fifth occurrence of the fraction equivalent to 3/7, it is first converted to 15/35, indicating it lies in the 49th block of the sequence. The position of this fraction is calculated to be 1211, derived from understanding triangular numbers and the structure of the sequence. The goal is to present the solution in a way that is accessible and understandable for a child.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Hi MHB,

My nephew, age 9, was asked the following question and he hoped I could solve the problem and then explain the solution to him using only elementary math concepts. My boyfriend has solved it, but he used a formula that he recalled seeing in a textbook by G.H. Hardy, and that involved knowledge of triangular numbers.

So, I don't know how to attack this problem from a 9 year old's perspective. If you happen to know how to simplify the problem, could you please enlighten me? Many thanks in advance.

Problem:
In the sequence of fractions $\dfrac{1}{1},\,\dfrac{2}{1},\,\dfrac{1}{2},\, \dfrac{3}{1},\,\dfrac{2}{2},\,\dfrac{1}{3},\, \dfrac{4}{1},\,\dfrac{3}{2},\,\dfrac{2}{3},\, \dfrac{1}{4},\, \dfrac{5}{1},\, \dfrac{4}{2},\, \dfrac{3}{3},\, \dfrac{2}{4},\,\dfrac{1}{5}\cdots$, fractions equivalent to any given fraction occur many times. For example, fractions equivalent to $\dfrac{1}{2}$ occur for the first two times in positions 3 and 14. In what position is the fifth occurrence of a fraction equivalent to $\dfrac{3}{7}$?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Hi MHB,

My nephew, age 9, was asked the following question and he hoped I could solve the problem and then explain the solution to him using only elementary math concepts. My boyfriend has solved it, but he used a formula that he recalled seeing in a textbook by G.H. Hardy, and that involved knowledge of triangular numbers.

So, I don't know how to attack this problem from a 9 year old's perspective. If you happen to know how to simplify the problem, could you please enlighten me? Many thanks in advance.

Problem:
In the sequence of fractions $\dfrac{1}{1},\,\dfrac{2}{1},\,\dfrac{1}{2},\, \dfrac{3}{1},\,\dfrac{2}{2},\,\dfrac{1}{3},\, \dfrac{4}{1},\,\dfrac{3}{2},\,\dfrac{2}{3},\, \dfrac{1}{4},\, \dfrac{5}{1},\, \dfrac{4}{2},\, \dfrac{3}{3},\, \dfrac{2}{4},\,\dfrac{1}{5}\cdots$, fractions equivalent to any given fraction occur many times. For example, fractions equivalent to $\dfrac{1}{2}$ occur for the first two times in positions 3 and 14. In what position is the fifth occurrence of a fraction equivalent to $\dfrac{3}{7}$?

Hello.(Whew)(Whew)

Let \ \dfrac{A_n}{B_m}

Let \ n=order \ number \ suscession \ numerator

Let \ x=number \ numerator

And:

Let \ m=order \ number \ suscession \ denominator

Let \ y=number \ denominator

Then:

x \ number \ position=\dfrac{n^2+(2x-1)n+x^2-3x+2}{2}. (1)

y \ number \ position=\dfrac{m^2+(2y-3)m+y^2-y+2}{2}. (2)

Making: x=m \ and \ y=n \rightarrow{}x \ number \ position=y \ number \ position

Example:

\dfrac{3}{7}=\dfrac{15}{35}

therefore:

x=15 \ and \ y=35

For (1): x \ number \ position=\dfrac{35^2+(2*15-1)35+15^2-3*15+2}{2}=1211

Same:

For (2): y \ number \ position=\dfrac{15^2+(2*35-3)15+35^2-35+2}{2}=1211

I had done a 'programme', showing how works this topic, but I have not been able to attach the file of Excel.(Headbang)Regards.
 
anemone said:
Hi MHB,

My nephew, age 9, was asked the following question and he hoped I could solve the problem and then explain the solution to him using only elementary math concepts. My boyfriend has solved it, but he used a formula that he recalled seeing in a textbook by G.H. Hardy, and that involved knowledge of triangular numbers.

So, I don't know how to attack this problem from a 9 year old's perspective. If you happen to know how to simplify the problem, could you please enlighten me? Many thanks in advance.

Problem:
In the sequence of fractions $\dfrac{1}{1},\,\dfrac{2}{1},\,\dfrac{1}{2},\, \dfrac{3}{1},\,\dfrac{2}{2},\,\dfrac{1}{3},\, \dfrac{4}{1},\,\dfrac{3}{2},\,\dfrac{2}{3},\, \dfrac{1}{4},\, \dfrac{5}{1},\, \dfrac{4}{2},\, \dfrac{3}{3},\, \dfrac{2}{4},\,\dfrac{1}{5}\cdots$, fractions equivalent to any given fraction occur many times. For example, fractions equivalent to $\dfrac{1}{2}$ occur for the first two times in positions 3 and 14. In what position is the fifth occurrence of a fraction equivalent to $\dfrac{3}{7}$?

Let's suppose to call $a_{n}$ the sequence at numerator and $b_{n}$ the sequence at denominator. It will be $a_{n}=3$ for $n = 4\ m + \frac {(m-1)\ (m-2)}{2}, m=1,2,...$ and $b_{n}=7$ for $k = 7\ (k+3) + \frac{(k-1)\ (k-2)}{2}, k=1,2,...$. By systematic search You find that is $a_{n}=3,\ b_{n} = 7$ for $k=3,\ m=7, n=43 $ and no other values of n. The succcesive search is dedicated to find the value of n for which is $a_{n}=6,\ b_{n}= 14$ and then the value of n for which $a_{n}=9,\ b_{n} = 21$ and so on, so that the solution of the problem is the value of n for which $a_{n}=15,\ b_{n}=35$. That is a little hard task for an old wolf like me but I'm sure that You will find the number n with no difficulties (Wink)...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
anemone said:
Hi MHB,

My nephew, age 9, was asked the following question and he hoped I could solve the problem and then explain the solution to him using only elementary math concepts. My boyfriend has solved it, but he used a formula that he recalled seeing in a textbook by G.H. Hardy, and that involved knowledge of triangular numbers.

So, I don't know how to attack this problem from a 9 year old's perspective. If you happen to know how to simplify the problem, could you please enlighten me? Many thanks in advance.

Problem:
In the sequence of fractions $\dfrac{1}{1},\,\dfrac{2}{1},\,\dfrac{1}{2},\, \dfrac{3}{1},\,\dfrac{2}{2},\,\dfrac{1}{3},\, \dfrac{4}{1},\,\dfrac{3}{2},\,\dfrac{2}{3},\, \dfrac{1}{4},\, \dfrac{5}{1},\, \dfrac{4}{2},\, \dfrac{3}{3},\, \dfrac{2}{4},\,\dfrac{1}{5}\cdots$, fractions equivalent to any given fraction occur many times. For example, fractions equivalent to $\dfrac{1}{2}$ occur for the first two times in positions 3 and 14. In what position is the fifth occurrence of a fraction equivalent to $\dfrac{3}{7}$?
I think this is a hard problem for a nine-year-old. The first step is to see that the fifth occurrence of a fraction equivalent to $\dfrac{3}{7}$ is the fraction$\dfrac{3\times5}{7\times5} = \dfrac{15}{35}.$

The given sequence consists of blocks of terms in which the sum of the numerator and denominator is constant. The series starts with a single term for which that sum is $2$. Then there is a block of two terms where the sum is $3$, a block of three terms where the sum is $4$, and so on. Within each block, the terms are ordered by their denominator. The first term in the block has denominator $1$, then $2$, and so on.

For the fraction $\dfrac{15}{35}$, the sum of the numerator and denominator is $15+35 = 50$, so it lies in the $49$th block. It will be the $35$th term in that block, so it will be $35$ places beyond the end of the $48$th block.

At this stage, I think that you are inevitably going to get drawn into the realm of triangular numbers. Somehow or other, you have to convince yourself that the $48$th block ends at the term whose position in the sequence is $\frac12\times 48\times 49 = 1176.$ It then follows that the fraction $\dfrac{15}{35}$ occurs at place $1176 + 35 = 1211.$

The average nine-year-old would probably find that argument too difficult to follow. But I am sure that a relative of anemone would relish it. (Wink)

Edit. To convince someone inexperienced in algebra to believe the formula $\frac12n(n+1)$ for the $n$th triangular number, I would draw an $n\times(n+1)$ array like this:
Code:
 + - - - - -
 + + - - - -
 + + + - - -
 + + + + - -
 + + + + + -
You can see from this that half of the $n(n+1)$ elements are $+$s, and also that the number of $+$s is $1+2+3+\ldots + n$.
 
Last edited:
Hi mente oscura and chisigma,

Thanks for your replies and I understand what both of you are saying, but for this problem, I have to solve it using the simplest way possible since it is a problem for my nephew, not me...if it were up to me to solve it, then I would attack it as I would attack a ferocious tiger in the forest, hehehe...:)

Hi Opalg,

Thank you so so much for the easy to follow explanation! I appreciate it from the bottom of my heart. I will also tell my nephew who Opalg is and also let him know you are someone I hold in the highest esteem. (Sun)

You can be sure that I am your number one "fan" on earth! (heart)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
142
Views
9K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
8K
Back
Top