Undergrad Solving Spinorial Maxwell's Equations with Wald

  • Thread starter Thread starter ergospherical
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maxwell's equations
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving Spinorial Maxwell's Equations as presented in Wald's Chapter 13. The main challenge is demonstrating that the conditions ##\partial^a F_{ab} = 0## and ##\partial_{[a} F_{bc]} = 0## are equivalent to the condition on the spinor ##\phi^{AB}##. A key point raised is the need to show that ##\partial_{AA'} \epsilon_{BC} = 0##, which is suggested to follow from the definition involving derivatives of the antisymmetric tensor. The conversation highlights the independence of the components of ##\epsilon^{\Sigma \Omega}## from spacetime coordinates, leading to zero derivatives. Additionally, it notes that in curved spacetime, a unique connection exists that maintains the zero covariant derivative of ##\epsilon##.
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
I'm trying to figure out how to do these sorts of calculations but I'm having a lot of trouble figuring out where to start. Take problem 3) of Chapter 13 of Wald, i.e. given that a real antisymmetric tensor ##F_{ab}##, corresponding to the spinorial tensor ##F_{AA' BB'}## by the map ##{\sigma^a}_{AA'}##, can be written as\begin{align*}
F_{AA' BB'} = \phi_{AB} \bar{\epsilon}_{A'B'} + \bar{\phi}_{A'B'} \epsilon_{AB}
\end{align*}to show that ##\partial^a F_{ab} = 0## and ##\partial_{[a} F_{bc]} = 0## if and only if ##\phi^{AB}## satisfies ##\partial_{A_1' A_1} \phi^{A_1, \dots, A_n} = 0##. I've really not much idea where to start; the spinor equivalent of the first Maxwell equation should be\begin{align*}
\partial^{AA'} F_{AA'BB'} = \phi_{AB} \partial^{AA'} \bar{\epsilon}_{A'B'} + \bar{\epsilon}_{A'B'} \partial^{AA'} \phi_{AB} + \bar{\phi}_{A'B'} \partial^{AA'} \epsilon_{AB} + \epsilon_{AB} \partial^{AA'} \bar{\phi}_{A'B'} = 0
\end{align*}In the text it's mentioned that ##\partial_{AA'} \epsilon_{BC} = 0##, but no proof is given. Maybe as a starter, how can I show that it follows from the definition ##\partial_{\Lambda \Lambda'} \epsilon_{\Sigma \Omega} = \sum_{\mu} {\sigma^{\mu}}_{\Lambda \Lambda'} \dfrac{\partial \epsilon_{\Sigma \Omega}}{\partial x^{\mu}}##? I reckon its simply because ##\epsilon^{\Sigma \Omega} = o^\Sigma \iota^\Omega - \iota^\Sigma o^\Omega## is independent of the spacetime coordinates, with ##\{o, \iota\}## being a fixed basis of ##W##...?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the components are constant, so all the derivatives will be zero. In curved space-time you need the theorem that there is a unique connection with the given properties, one of which is that the ##\epsilon## has zero covariant derivative.
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
MOVING CLOCKS In this section, we show that clocks moving at high speeds run slowly. We construct a clock, called a light clock, using a stick of proper lenght ##L_0##, and two mirrors. The two mirrors face each other, and a pulse of light bounces back and forth betweem them. Each time the light pulse strikes one of the mirrors, say the lower mirror, the clock is said to tick. Between successive ticks the light pulse travels a distance ##2L_0## in the proper reference of frame of the clock...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
998
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
479
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K