Solving the 10 Particle Loss Problem After MCNP5 Run

Click For Summary
The termination of the MCNP5 run due to 10 lost particles is likely caused by issues in the geometry definition. It's essential to ensure that every volume is part of a defined cell and that no volume is left undefined or overlaps multiple cells. Reviewing the output file and using the vised editor can help identify problematic areas, particularly where irregular shapes are involved. Additionally, ensuring that unit cells are correctly defined and complement cells are accurately described is crucial. Properly addressing these geometry issues should resolve the particle loss problem.
Rowayda
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
After running MCNP5, the output run terminated because 10 particles got lost
how i can fix this problem ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The most likely thing is you have a problem in your geometry. Someplace you have a volume that is not part of a cell. Read your output file. Also, look in the user manual to see how to get it to output the track information for particles. What you want to find out is where a particle was when it got lost. That should give you a clue as to where there is a problem in your geometry. Every volume must be in a defined cell. You must not have any volume that is undefined. Also, every volume must be in exactly one cell. You can't have any volumes that are in two or more cells.

A frequent place to get into trouble is in arrays. You may not have defined the unit cell the way you thought. So it may not fill the volume you thought.

Another place to get in trouble is when you are doing a cell and the complement. You may have defined the outside of a cell differently from how you thought.

Look for places where you have unusual or irregular shapes, especially where they bound other irregular shapes.

Use the vised editor to help you figure out what cells are not properly defined. One of the tell-tales that vised shows is a dotted line at the boundary of a cell. That usually indicates a problem in the geometry.
 
  • Like
Likes watermelon
What type of energy is actually stored inside an atom? When an atom is split—such as in a nuclear explosion—it releases enormous energy, much of it in the form of gamma-ray electromagnetic radiation. Given this, is it correct to say that the energy stored in the atom is fundamentally electromagnetic (EM) energy? If not, how should we properly understand the nature of the energy that binds the nucleus and is released during fission?

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K