Solving the First Equation: v1, v2, & ωR

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a ring and a bug in motion, focusing on the relationships between their velocities and angular momentum. The participants are examining the justification of the first equation related to these motions and the implications of the signs of the velocities involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the signs of v2 and ωR, and whether they should be opposite. There is also confusion regarding the definition and role of v1, particularly in relation to the vertical displacement of the ring. Some participants are exploring the implications of the bug's movement direction on the ring's motion.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the relationships between the velocities and the conservation of momentum. There is acknowledgment of the complexity involved in visualizing the motion and the need for careful consideration of the frames of reference. Some guidance has been offered regarding the visualization of the problem and the importance of instantaneous velocities.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem involves understanding the instantaneous velocities at a specific starting position, and there is mention of the difficulty in visualizing the motion of the ring and the bug. The discussion also highlights the need to consider different frames of reference for momentum conservation.

Gourab_chill
Messages
55
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
I have posted the question below. My question is how to form the equations to solve the question below.
Relevant Equations
v=ωr
Capture.PNG


I've marked correct answers above. Have a look at the solutions:
Capture1.PNG

How is the first equation justified? Shouldn't v2 and ωR be of opposite signs? What is v1? And how is it equal to v2? My biggest problem is the source of v1 since the ring is not having vertical displacement, then what is v1?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Gourab_chill said:
Shouldn't v2 and ωR be of opposite signs?
Don't confuse the rotation of the line joining the mass centres, which will be anticlockwise, with the rotation of the ring about its own centre, which will therefore be clockwise so that total angular momentum remains zero.
ω is the rate of the latter.
Gourab_chill said:
What is v1? And how is it equal to v2?
v1 is the velocity of the ring's mass centre in the ground frame. v2 is the velocity of the bug in the ground frame. These must be equal and opposite so that total linear momentum remains zero.
 
haruspex said:
Don't confuse the rotation of the line joining the mass centres, which will be anticlockwise, with the rotation of the ring about its own centre, which will therefore be clockwise so that total angular momentum remains zero.
ω is the rate of the latter.

So, the first equation is for the rotation for line joining the center of masses. Okay. But, if the bug moves upwards (let's say) then the ring will rotate clockwise and so the direction of v1 and ωR would be same, right? Wouldn't they be of opposite signs? You did say the rotation will be anti-clockwise, am I mistaking somewhere or did you consider the bug to move down?
haruspex said:
v1 is the velocity of the ring's mass centre in the ground frame. v2 is the velocity of the bug in the ground frame. These must be equal and opposite so that total linear momentum remains zero.

So the ring does have some motion along the vertical plane right? It's kinda hard to visualize though. Can I conclude that the ring will keep bouncing all the time?
 
Gourab_chill said:
So, the first equation is for the rotation for line joining the center of masses.
No, I wrote "the latter", i.e. the rotation of the ring about its own centre.

Yes, it is hard to visualise. Part of the difficulty is that we are only concerned with the instantaneous velocities at the starting position. It will soon look rather different. To minimise this problem, take the part of the circle where the bug is to be a straight line.
Try drawing a diagram showing:
  • The initial positions of mass centre, ring centre and bug
  • Positions of ring centre, bug, and the point X on the ring where the bug started, after a short time t.
The mass centre does not move.
The ring centre will have moved down v1t, X will have moved further down, and the bug will have moved up v2t.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Gourab_chill and etotheipi
It's a fiddly little thing. You need to be careful to think about in which frames of reference angular momentum and/or linear momentum are conserved. They're both conserved in the lab frame, and also in the CM frame of the whole system.

Once you've got that, it's more a matter of just being careful with the algebra in finding the correct relative velocities.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
2K