Solving the Schroedinger Equation for An Anisotropic Oscillator Potential

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the time-independent Schrödinger equation for a particle in a 3D anisotropic oscillator potential. Participants are exploring the nature of the potential and the corresponding stationary states and energies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to separate variables in the Schrödinger equation and expresses the wave function as a product of functions of each spatial variable. They encounter difficulties in solving the resulting differential equation for one of the variables.
  • Some participants suggest starting with simpler cases or known solutions, such as the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator, to build towards the solution for the anisotropic case.
  • Questions arise regarding the form of the differential equations and the implications of the constants involved, as well as the appropriateness of the assumed forms of the wave function.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing hints and suggestions for approaching the differential equations. There is a recognition of the complexity involved, and some guidance has been offered regarding the structure of the equations and potential methods for solving them.

Contextual Notes

There is an acknowledgment of the challenges posed by the anisotropic nature of the potential and the need to carefully consider the separation of variables and the resulting equations. Participants are also reflecting on their understanding of related concepts from simpler systems.

Wishe Deom
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a particle of mass m moving in a 3D-anisotropic oscillator potential:
V(\vec{r}) = \frac{1}{2}m(\omega^{2}_{x}x^{2}+\omega^{2}_{y}y^{2}+\omega^{2}_{z}z^{2}). (a) Frind the stationary states for this potential and their respective energies.

Homework Equations


Time-Independent Schroedinger Equation in 3 dimensions is \frac{\bar{h}^{2}}{2m}\nabla^{2}\psi+V\psi=E\psi

The Attempt at a Solution


I first tried to find solutions to the TISE in the form of \psi=X(x)Y(y)Z(z), taking all the partial derivatives, dividing through by XYZ, and arranging one side to be a function of x, and the other to be a function of y and z, equaling a constant of separation A.

However, when solving for X(x), I have an equation of the form \frac{\partial^{2}X}{\partial x^2} = (C + x^2}X. I have no idea how to solve this for X. Am I apporaching this problem in the correct way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You'd know how to solve that equation if C were equal to zero, right? Try starting with that solution, and then see if you can add something to it to make it satisfy the equation you have.
 
diazona said:
You'd know how to solve that equation if C were equal to zero, right? Try starting with that solution, and then see if you can add something to it to make it satisfy the equation you have.

I didn't know the solution to X'' = x^2 X, but Wolfram Alpha tells me it involves some function D, which I have never before seen. That's why I was having doubts as to whether my reasoning up to this point had been sound.
 
Check all of your signs and then review the solution of the 1d harmonic oscillator. The correct equations give 3 copies of the Schrödinger equation for the 1d HO.
 
Oh wait, I think I misread the equation (and was thinking about entirely the wrong problem!). Yes, you're right, solving that equation isn't quite trivial.

How much do you know about the one-dimensional quantum harmonic oscillator?
 
I am very familiar with the 1d harmonic oscillator, and I would know how to solve each of the three equations if I got them, but I'm not sure how to get there.

If I look for solutions of the form \psi = X(x) + Y(y) +Z(z), then the term in the SE V \psi would be some nine-term monstrosity, wouldn't it?
 
You were correct to look for solutions in terms of a product. Rewrite the equation for X(x) (it would help to leave the physical quantities in) and compare it to the equation for a 1d HO.
 
Wishe Deom said:
I am very familiar with the 1d harmonic oscillator, and I would know how to solve each of the three equations if I got them, but I'm not sure how to get there.
What's the difference between the equation you got for the x direction and the equation for the 1D harmonic oscillator?
 
Try assuming the solution of the form:

X(x)=e^{\frac{x^2}{2}}v(x) and put it into the original DE equation (for X(x)). You should get the DE for v(x) which you can solve by power series method. And there should be some constrains on the recursion...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K