Solving the Sliding Block Problem: Fig. 4-48

  • Thread starter Thread starter Toxage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Sliding
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a block sliding down a smooth inclined plane at an angle of 25 degrees to the horizontal, with friction ignored. Participants are tasked with determining the acceleration of the block.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of right triangle trigonometry to analyze forces acting on the block. There is an emphasis on defining forces and drawing free body diagrams. Some express confusion about the necessity of mass and how to calculate forces without it.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various interpretations of the forces involved. Some have suggested algebraic approaches and the use of trigonometric functions to express the normal force and the gravitational force components. There is no explicit consensus yet, but several productive lines of reasoning are being pursued.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of specific numerical values for mass and forces, which is causing some confusion in their calculations. The problem only provides the angle and mentions that friction is to be ignored.

Toxage
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The block shown in Fig. 4-48 lies on a smooth plane tilted at an angle = 25.0 degrees to the horizontal. Ignore Friction.

Determine the acceleration of the block as it slides down the plane.

Picture: http://img504.imageshack.us/my.php?image=webassignplanesa0.jpg

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Our teacher taught us to solve the problem by using right triangle trig, SOHCAHTOA etc, but I can't do that since I don't have enough information...

Does anyone know how I can begin this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You do need to use right angled trig, and you do have enough information.

I would start by defining all of the forces acting on the block (a free body diagram can help).

Then sum up the forces in each direction, divide by mass and you have your answer.
 
Rake-MC said:
You do need to use right angled trig, and you do have enough information.

I would start by defining all of the forces acting on the block (a free body diagram can help).

Then sum up the forces in each direction, divide by mass and you have your answer.

The problem doesn't give you any mass...

The problem only gives you two angles!
 
Ahh, but you don't need to know what the mass is to solve it! Take the advice from my first post; sum up the forces in each direction and tell me what you get.
 
Rake-MC said:
Ahh, but you don't need to know what the mass is to solve it! Take the advice from my first post; sum up the forces in each direction and tell me what you get.

I'm not given any forces...

How do I calculate a force?
 
Okay, first we'll write this problem out algebraically.
You need to use your basic knowledge to find out where the forces are in this question.

We can assume that there is going to be a force on the mass due to the acceleration due to gravity. Fgravity = mg.

There is going to also be a normal reaction force, the nature of this normal force is that it will be perpendicular to the plane it's sitting on. Can you work out the normal reaction in terms of Fgravity?
 
Rake-MC said:
Okay, first we'll write this problem out algebraically.
You need to use your basic knowledge to find out where the forces are in this question.

We can assume that there is going to be a force on the mass due to the acceleration due to gravity. Fgravity = mg.

There is going to also be a normal reaction force, the nature of this normal force is that it will be perpendicular to the plane it's sitting on. Can you work out the normal reaction in terms of Fgravity?

Fn = Fgravity?

I have no clue
 
No, Fn is going to be the component of gravity that is perpendicular to the plane. We have the hypotenuse (Fgravity) and we have an angle (25 degrees). Can you use trigonometry to find Fn in terms of Fgravity? Let me know if you aren't understanding this too.
 
I'm confused how I can use Fg to find Fn, when I don't know what Fg is.
 
  • #10
I tried 9.8Sin25 and 9.8Cos25, and both didn't work...
 
  • #11
Okay, we have to understand that we're not solving for numbers yet. We are just solving algebraically, using letters to represent the forces.

I can see where you're a little confused, Fg = mg, but we don't know m. (g of course = 9.8ms-2)

Try to solve for Fn in terms of Fg using trigonometry, there are more details in my previous post.

Hint: The answer will look like either: [tex]F_gsin(\theta)[/tex], [tex]F_gcos(\theta)[/tex] or [tex]F_gtan(\theta)[/tex]. Can you work out which one and why?
 
  • #12
FgTan?

Because I just tried FgSin and FgCos and both didn't work.
 
  • #13
FgTan doesn't work either... Now I am down to one last try on my webassign...

Edit:

It seems like it should be FgSin

http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/686/fbdue2.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #14
We're not at the answer yet. This is just the normal reaction force. It is infact [tex]F_gcos(\theta)[/tex]. This is because the if Fg is the hypotenuse, Fn is the adjacent angle to theta. Using SOHCAHTOA we can derive [tex]F_gcos(\theta)[/tex].

Now, we have the normal reaction force and the gravitational force. We can see though, that these two forces do not balance out (they are not equal and opposite), which hints that there must be another component of force in the system. This is true.
It is going to be the component of gravity that is parallel to the plane.
We have the component perpendicular to the plane ([tex]F_gcos(\theta)[/tex]), how can we use trigonometry now to solve for the component parallel?

Once you have worked out this force in terms of Fg (mg) you can divide by mass to achieve your answer.
 
  • #15
Rake-MC said:
We're not at the answer yet. This is just the normal reaction force. It is infact [tex]F_gcos(\theta)[/tex]. This is because the if Fg is the hypotenuse, Fn is the adjacent angle to theta. Using SOHCAHTOA we can derive [tex]F_gcos(\theta)[/tex].

Now, we have the normal reaction force and the gravitational force. We can see though, that these two forces do not balance out (they are not equal and opposite), which hints that there must be another component of force in the system. This is true.
It is going to be the component of gravity that is parallel to the plane.
We have the component perpendicular to the plane ([tex]F_gcos(\theta)[/tex]), how can we use trigonometry now to solve for the component parallel?

Once you have worked out this force in terms of Fg (mg) you can divide by mass to achieve your answer.

Can you draw a picture?

My picture is wrong then?
 
  • #16
Not at all, your picture is correct. Here is a modified version of it:

http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/2159/webassignplanesa0ya6.jpg

pardon the poor drawing skills.. An important concept (but sometimes hard to get a grip of initially) to realize is that just as the three sides of the triangle are proportional to the angles of the triangle, so are the forces due to gravity and normal force proportional to the same angle.

I have drawn another triangle with the same angle in it, and you can see that Fg is the hypotenuse, Fn is the adjacent vertex, and the ? vertex is the one that we are solving for.

What would this vertex be in terms of Fg (mg) and a trigonometric function?

I hope you are understanding this, let me know if you aren't.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #17
The ? would be equal to FgSin
 
  • #18
Bingo!
We also know that Fg = mg (right?)

Therefore, we can say that [tex]F_{parallel} = mgsin(\theta)[/tex]

We also know that F = ma. Therefore, [tex]mgsin(\theta) = ma[/tex] and we are solving for a (acceleration). Can you solve this?
 
  • #19
Yes

Devide by M on both sides and the m's cancel each other

Therefore

gsin(theta) = a

But I already tried that..

9.8sin(25) = 4.14
 
  • #20
Hmm you will want to get a second opinion on this then, I interpreted the question as solving for the acceleration in the x plane (possibly because of the axes they provided).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
18K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K