Sliding Block Problem (We must solve together)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fusilli_Jerry89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Sliding
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a large cube and a small cube on a frictionless surface, focusing on the conditions required to prevent the small cube from sliding down due to gravity. The problem includes concepts of static friction, forces acting on the cubes, and the relationship between vertical and horizontal accelerations.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the forces acting on the small cube, including gravity and friction, and discuss the necessary conditions for equilibrium. There are attempts to calculate the force of friction and the normal force, with some questioning the relationships between these forces.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, raising questions about the forces involved and the calculations presented. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to identify all forces acting on the small cube and to apply Newton's second law, but there is no explicit consensus on how to proceed.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the definitions of normal force and friction, as well as the relevance of certain equations mentioned. The discussion reflects a learning environment where assumptions and interpretations are being critically examined.

Fusilli_Jerry89
Messages
158
Reaction score
0
Sliding Block Problem (Please Help!)

http://img441.imageshack.us/img441/1809/physicsyj6.jpg

The drawing shows a large cube(mass=25 kg) being accelerated across a frictionless surface by a horizontal force P. A small cube(mass=4.0 kg) is in contact with the front surface of the large cube and will slide down unless P is sufficiently large. The coefficient of static friction between the cubes in 0.71. WHat is the smallest magnitude that P can have in order to keep the small cube from sliding downward?

What i did:

4.0 x 9.8 = 39.2 x 0.71 = 27.832 N
39.2 - 27.832 = 4.0a
a = 2.842 m/s/s

I do not know what the acceleration in the x direction must be in order to make the acceleration upward match 2.842.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If it doesn't slide down, what does that say about the vertical acceleration?
 
Draw the direction of the force of friction, and draw the direction of gravity acting on the small cube. Further on, what does the force of friction equal? In what relation must the force of friction be with gravity acting on the small cube? You can retrieve the minimal value of P from this inequality easily.
 
the force of friction is 27.832 N upwards but it must be 39.2 N in order to keep the cube up. This means an extra 11.368 N must be applied upwards. I don't know what to do after this...
 
does the force of gravity change from straight down to an angle?
 
Fusilli_Jerry89 said:
the force of friction is 27.832 N upwards
How did you determine that?

but it must be 39.2 N in order to keep the cube up. This means an extra 11.368 N must be applied upwards.
There are only two forces acting vertically: friction (up) and gravitational force (down). They must balance if the block is not to slide down.

does the force of gravity change from straight down to an angle?
Nope. It points straight down as always.

Hint: Your first goal is to determine the normal force between the cubes that will provide sufficient friction.
 
Doc Al said:
How did you determine that?


There are only two forces acting vertically: friction (up) and gravitational force (down). They must balance if the block is not to slide down.


Nope. It points straight down as always.

Hint: Your first goal is to determine the normal force between the cubes that will provide sufficient friction.

I got 27.832 N up by this (4.0 x 9.8 = 39.2 x 0.71 = 27.832 N) Doesn't that mean that 39.2 Netwons are directed downwards, and 27.832 N is directed upwards? Does this mean you need an extra 11.368 N upwards in order to keep the block from sliding?
 
Fusilli_Jerry89 said:
I got 27.832 N up by this (4.0 x 9.8 = 39.2 x 0.71 = 27.832 N)
Ah... I see what you did. (Please be careful how you write things. That looks like an equation, but you really meant it in two steps, right?)

(1) You found the weight of the small cube: mg = 39.2 N (OK!)

(2) Then, for some reason, you multiplied by the coefficient of friction. (Not OK!)

To find the force of friction, you need to multiply the normal force by mu. (The normal force is not the weight! The normal force acts horizontally in this case; the weight acts vertically.)

You have to solve for the normal force.
 
Doc Al said:
Ah... I see what you did. (Please be careful how you write things. That looks like an equation, but you really meant it in two steps, right?)

(1) You found the weight of the small cube: mg = 39.2 N (OK!)

(2) Then, for some reason, you multiplied by the coefficient of friction. (Not OK!)

To find the force of friction, you need to multiply the normal force by mu. (The normal force is not the weight! The normal force acts horizontally in this case; the weight acts vertically.)

You have to solve for the normal force.

I looked on the internet and found that normal force is equal to mg - Tsin(theta), but how can I solve this without a degree in the question? I learn better if I can see the solution, because I memorize concepts very well.
 
  • #10
Fusilli_Jerry89 said:
I looked on the internet and found that normal force is equal to mg - Tsin(theta), but how can I solve this without a degree in the question?
What makes you think that that expression is relevant to this situation? (T probably stands for tension!)

Instead, do this: Identify all the forces acting on the small cube. (Hint: There are three such forces.) Tell me everything you know about those forces. For each force, tell me the magnitude if you know it (use symbols not numbers) and the direction. Then we will apply Newton's 2nd law to those forces.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K